MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931088277 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6907547

Pelopsis baloghi Behan-Pelletier & Eamer & K.W 2003, sp. n.

2003· article· en· W6931088277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaAcariOribatidaLamella (surface anatomy)ParasitiformesIntegument

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pelopsis baloghi sp. n. (Figs 1–14) Material examined – Holotype: adult m. Costa Rica: Heredia, Estación Biologica La Selva, Swampo Experimentale, 10°26’N 84°01’W, 9 June 1997 (V. BEHAN- PELLETIER), aquatic vegetation and debris, deposited in the Acari collections of INBio, Insitituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Santo Domingo, Costa Rica. Paratypes: 10 with same data as holotype; 2 with same data as holotype, except 17 May 1995, from saturated soil. Paratypes deposited in the Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arachnids, Agricultureand Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada, INBio, thecollections of R. A. N ORTON and the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. Etymology – This species is named in honor of Professor JÁNOS BALOGH for his outstanding contributions to knowledge of Oribatida worldwide. Diagnosis. Adult – Total length 420–508 µm; integument striate on notogaster, pteromorphs, epimeres, ventral, genital and anal plates and mentum; lamella developed as very strong ridge, 91–101 µm long; lamellar setae arising anteroventrally on lamellar cusps; seta in 98–127 µm long; sensillus 60–72 µm long, with heavily barbed, long clavate head; notogastral setae very short, thin, at most 6 µm long. Description. Adult: Measurements – Mean total length: females (n = 10) 454 µm (range 420–508); males (n = 3) 441 µm (range 422–499). Mean notogastral width: females (n = 10) 304 µm (range288–336), males (n = 3), 303 µm (range288–336). Integument. Microtuberculate on prodorsum, tutorium, genal process, pedotectum I, anterolaterally on epimere I, and on leg segments. Striate on notogaster, pteromorphs, epimeres, ventral, genital and anal plates, mentum, abaxially on femora III and IV and dorsodistally on trochanters III and IV. Prodorsum – Rostral margin strongly concave medially, with 2 lateral dens (Figs 11, 12). Seta ro 53–58 µm long, weakly barbed, acuminate (Figs 1, 12). Lamella developed as very strong ridge, 91–101 µm long, almost parallel (Figs 1, 9), ridge undulating in bothridial region (Fig. 9); lamellar cusp 17–19 µm long, parallel (Fig. 8). Seta le barbed, 19–24 µm long, arising anteroventrally on lamellar cusp, directed anterolaterally, extending beyond tip of rostrum (Figs 10, 11). Seta in 98–127 µm long, inserted on transverse ridge, dorsoventrally flattened, strongly barbed dorsally and laterally, narrow proximally and distally, broadening medially, with conspicuous medial and lateral dens about 24 µm long and small dens between them about 4–7 µm long (Figs 1, 10). Mutual distance of setal pairs ro-ro, le-le and in-in, about 60 µm, 22–24 µm and 29–31 µm, respectively. Seta ex barbed, about 35 µm long. Sensillus 60–72 µm long, with heavily barbed, long clavate head, rounded distally, curved anteromedially (Figs 1, 8). Dorsal apodemes (dorsophragmata) well separated basally (Fig. 1). Porose area Ad circular and medial to bothridium. Lateral aspect of prodorsum – Genal process triangular, tapered to point, with well-developed ridge(Fig. 12). Tutorium, including cusp, about 112 µm long, distinctly pointed distally, (Figs 3, 12), with longitudinal ridges dorsoproximally (Fig. 9); tutorial cusp about 36 µm long. Tutorium strongly curved medially forming concise fit with ridge on genal process (Figs 11, 12). Pedotectum I with strongly concave dorsal margin, with dorsal insertion posterior of seta ex (Fig. 3). Custodium about 12 µm long (Fig. 14). Circumpedal carina strongly developed, curving to level of setae 3b (Figs 3, 13, 14). Notogaster – Longer than wide, ratio 1.2:1. Lenticulus well-developed, subrectangular in shape (Fig. 1). Notogastral striae with thumb-print pattern, directed longitudinally on anterior third of notogaster and transversly posterior to level of saccule S1 (Fig. 6). Notogastral setae very short, thin, at most 6 µm long (Fig. 1). Saccules small, clearly evident, Sa positioned anterior of seta lm, S1 posterolateral of lp, S2 midway between setae h 3 and h 2, S3 lateral of seta h 1 (Fig. 1). Ventral region – Epimere I tuberculate anterolaterally, remainder of epimeres I to IV striate (Figs 11, 12). Epimeral setae weakly barbed, tapered, 3b longest setae, about 34 µm, other epimeral setae 16–24 µm long. Genital plates with longitudinal striae, anal plates with predominantly transverse striae, striae on ventral plate predominantly longitudinal (Fig. 2). Genital setae about 17 µm, g 1 and g 2 weakly barbed, positioned on anterior margin of plate (Fig. 13). Aggenital, anal and adanal setae smooth, thin, about 6–10 µm long. Postanal porose area not evident. Gnathosoma – Mentum with predominantly longitudinal striae; gena with striae directed anteromedially (Figs 2, 11). Axillary saccule of subcapitulum about 10 µm long. Legs – Setation (I-IV): trochanters, 1–1–2–1; femora, 5–5–2–2; genua 3(1)–3(1)–1(1)–2; tibiae, 4(2)–4(1)–3(1)–3(1); tarsi, 20(2)–15(2)–15–12 (Figs 4, 5). Tibia I with small anterodorsal dens rior of circumventral groove indicated by arrowhead (Fig. 4). Tibiae I and II indented abaxially (Fig. 10). Femur II with ventral ridge and ventral projection, with seta bv” positioned abaxial to ridge (Fig. 5). Tibia and tarsus II with dorsal ridge; tarsus II with two tandem dorsal spines abaxial of solenidia (Fig. 5). Trochanters and femora III and IV with ventral carina and ridge; femora III and IV and trochanter IV with striae abaxally. Tibia and tarsus IV thickened dorsally; dorsal integument of tibia and tarsus III not thickened. Remarks – The presence of dens dorsally on tarsus II is one of the character states used by HAMMER (1961) to separate Pelopsis bidentatus from thetypespe - cies, Pelopsis bifurcata. Neither EWING (1909), in theoriginal description of the type species, or WOOLLEY (1958) who redescribed the species, noted dens dorsally on tarsus II. Dens are not evident on a cotype slide specimen of P. bifurcata that we have examined. However, variation in this character state in specimens from North America argues for caution in its use as a key character. Adults of Pelopsis baloghi though similar to the two other described species in the genus, can be easily distinguished on the basis of character states outlined in the following key.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207