Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) vitrina Casey. All 1906
Bibliographic record
Abstract
XII. Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) vitrina species group (Seevers, 1951: 714) 22. Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) vitrina Casey Figs 21, 139–144; Map 18 Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) vitrina, Casey 1906: 291; Seevers 1951: 714; Moore and Legner 1975: 433; Campbell and Davies 1991: 107. Gyrophaena attonsa Casey, 1911: 184. Synonymized by Seevers 1951: 714. Description. Body length 2.4–3.5 mm, broadly subparallel; head rufo-piceous; pronotum flavate with dark median band; elytra brown with silvery luster; abdomen Map Ι8. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Gyrophaena vitrina flavate, apical portion of abdomen often slightly darker. Punctation: vertex of head with about six moderately-sized umbilicate punctures on each side, pronotum with two median rows of weak punctures and additional punctures elsewhere, elytra with fine, sparse punctures. Microsculpture: not apparent. Antennae as illustrated (Fig. 21). Pronotum 1.5 times as wide as long. MALE: tergite 8 with two lateral teeth and usually two (occasionally four) small median teeth, apical margin slightly emarginate (Fig. 141); sternite 8 produced apically (Fig. 142). Median lobe of aedeagus with narrowly elongate tubus and ventrally produced apex (Fig. 139), projection of internal sac narrowly elongate, flagellum slightly everted (Fig. 139). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 140). FEMALE. Tergite 8 truncate apically (Fig. 143); sternite 8 produced posteriorly (Fig. 144); spermatheca not found [it may be very small and difficult to find or it is completely reduced]. Bionomics. Macrohabitat: mixed forest, hardwood forest, rich Appalachian hardwood forest, flood plain forest, and eastern white cedar swamps, and mature red spruce and red maple forest. Microhabitat: on gilled mushrooms on forest floor, on small gilled mushrooms on side of log, on bracket fungi, and on Trametes hirsuta on a poplar log. Collecting period: June, July, August, and September. Collecting method: sifting mushrooms and aspirating specimens. Distribution (Map 18). CANADA: New Brunswick, Ontario, and Quebec; UNITED STATES: Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".