MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931111429 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4449997

Victoriana parvicornis

2020· article· en· W6931111429 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGynecological conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSternumDorsumHead (geology)Hook

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Victoriana parvicornis species group Ocyptamus parvicornis species group. Thompson (1981) Description. *Body orange (Fig. 49). Head. Face pale and of normal width (~1/3 of head width); tubercle ventrally positioned. Frons very narrow (~1/4 of head width). Antennal insertions confluent. Female ocellar triangle adjacent to lateral eye margin. Dorsal occiput with 2 rows of pile. Thorax. Scutum without distinct anterior row of pile. Anterior anepisternum pilose. Katatergite with inconspicuous microtrichia. Metaepisternum pilose. Metasternum bare. Upper calypter margin bare. Metafemur with normal pile. Wing. Alula very narrow and inconspicuous (narrower than c cell). Wing mostly hyaline, sometimes with dark apical spot. Abdomen. Abdomen petiolated and narrow, orange and without colour pattern (Fig. 49); *male sternum 5 with pair of apico-lateral extensions (Fig. 57). Terminalia. Female tergum 7 divided into a pair of quadrangular sclerites (Fig. 101); tergum 8 rectangular and with setae (Fig. 101); cercus without pile but with homogenously distributed setulae. *Male sternum 8 with basal long projection (Fig. 57); *epandrium closing around cerci, without apical gap (Fig. 58); *surstyli asymmetrical and connected medially by a sclerotized bridge (Fig. 58); hypandrium compact *with very short postgonite with concave apical margin (Fig. 60); phallus heavily sclerotized and enlarged, *distiphallus hood-shaped (Fig. 59). Included species (2). V. ferruginea (Thompson 1981) comb. nov. [2], V. parvicornis (Loew, 1861) comb. nov. [1b, 3, 4]. Comments. The female of the V. parvicornis species group differs from congeners in that the epiproct is divided into a pair of distinct plates (Fig. 101). The setulose (not pilose) female cercus (Fig. 101) is also quite distinct, however similar cerci occur in the genus Relictanum. There are undescribed species of Fragosa (e.g. USN-MENT01243085) with apical extensions on sternum 4 instead of 5 (Fig. 57), but these are medial and not lateral as in the V. parvicornis group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGynecological conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207