Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subfamily * Macrocorsinae Vondráček, 1963 Euphalerini Bekker-Migdisova, 1973: 112. Comments The monophyly of Macrocorsinae is very strongly supported in both mtg analyses. The four genera treated in the analyses are also assigned to this subfamily by Burckhardt & Ouvrard (2012) who included another eight genera. Meanwhile, Euphaleropsis and Peregrinivena were synonymised (Burckhardt et al. 2018b). Trisetipsylla was placed in the Macrocorsinae by Cho et al. (2019) rather that in Psyllinae (Burckhardt & Ouvrard 2012). At least some species of Trisetipsylla have immatures with extra pore fields on the caudal plate, supporting this placement. Otroacizzia † Klimaszewski, 1996 contains the following species: O. muta † Klimaszewski, 1996 (type species), O. prosapia † Klimaszewski, 1996, O. soriae † Peñalver & García-Gimeno, 2006 and O. tertia † Klimaszewski, 1996. Burckhardt & Ouvrard (2012) synonymised Otroacizzia with Euryconus. A reevaluation of the status of the four fossil species by Klimaszewski (1996) and Peñalver & García- Gimeno (2006) showed that Otroacizzia is a species mix referrable to Colophorina (O. muta) and to Euryconus (other species). Whereas the antennae are short and a genual spine is lacking in O. muta, the antennae are long and the genual spine is developed in the other three species. Thus, O. muta shows the characteristics of Colophorina, making Otroacizzia † a junior synonym of the former. The other three species of Otroacizzia † conform with the diagnosis of Euryconus and are transferred there. The following new synonymy and new combinations are proposed here: Colophorina Capener, 1973 = Otroacizzia † Klimaszewski, 1996, syn. nov. Colophorina muta † (Klimaszewski, 1996) comb. nov. from Otroacizzia † Euryconus prosapia † (Klimaszewski, 1996) comb. nov. from Otroacizzia † Euryconus soriae † (Peñalver & García-Gimeno, 2006) comb. nov. from Otroacizzia † Euryconus tertia † (Klimaszewski, 1996) comb. nov. from Otroacizzia † Included genera Apsyllopsis Burckhardt & Queiroz, 2020; Brinckitia Heslop-Harrison, 1961; * Colophorina Capener, 1973 (syn. Otroacizzia †, syn. nov.); * Epiacizzia Li, 2002; Euphaleropsis Li, 2004 (syn. Peregrinivena); * Euphalerus Schwarz, 1904; Euryconus Aulmann, 1912; Macrocorsa Vondráček, 1963; * Paraphyllura Yang, 1984; Pugionipsylla Li in Li et al., 2006; Retroacizzia Heslop-Harrison, 1961; Tridencopsylla Li, 2002; Trisetipsylla Yang & Li, 1984.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".