MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931131495 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5570474

Бронзовое блюдо с позолотой изи Второго Караванского кургана раннескифской поры (Украинская Левобережная Лесостепь)

2021· article· en· W6931131495 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssyriaAnalogyQuarter (Canadian coin)BronzeMetropolitan areaProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to a unique find of Near Asian origin - a bronze plate with chased ornamentation and gilding, found in the Scythian archaic barrow № 2 near the Karavan village, near the town of Lyubotin, Kharkiv region (Seversky Donets basin). We had an opportunity to conduct an independent study of this product. There are several opinions about the place of manufacture of this plate. Some authors associated the Karavan plate with Achaemenid Iran and dated by the 7th-6th centuries BC. Others saw in it, not without reason, Assyrian products, determining the time of the product by the 9th-8th or the 3rd quarter of the 8th - early 7th centuries BC. We believe that the opinion about the Assyrian roots of this product is quite convincing. According to the Karavan plate’s closest analogy - in terms of the ornament- on the bronze-based pix from the collection of the Metropolitan Museum, we find it possible to extend the chronological framework of the production of the plate in Assyria to the whole 7th century BC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→