MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931135681 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5481157

Lepidostoma bufiel Malicky 2017, nov.sp.

2017· article· de· W6931135681 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumPhallus (fungus)Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lepidostoma bufiel nov.sp. M a t e r i a l:HT3: Nepal, Sukha Pokhari, Milke Danda Ridge, 3000m, 27°24‘N, 87°53‘E, 5.- 6.4.2001, leg. Allen, in meiner Samlung. Diese Art kommt auch in Sikkim vor, von wo es Belege in der Schmid-Sammlung in Ottawa gibt (persönliche Mitteilung von John Weaver). Ganz braun, Flügel ohne Auffälligkeiten, etwas rundlich. Der Scapus ist ein einfacher, relativ kurzer Stab. VFL 8,5 mm. 3 KA (Tafel 8): 9. Segment im Ventralteil stark nach hinten vorstehend, dorsal sehr kurz. Der Dorsalkomplex springt in LA ungefähr so weit nach hinten vor als das 9. Segment ventral lang ist, hat einen dorsalen dicht behaarten Buckel und ist distal abgerundet. Die OA sind kurz und länglich eiförmig. In DA hat der Dorsalkomplex aus breiter Basis vier gleich lange Finger. Das erste Glied der UA ist lang und schlank, in LA leicht keulenförmig, in VA nur leicht nach innen gebogen, relativ breit und mit einem grossen, nach innen weisenden Zahn in der Mitte der Innenkante. Aussen distal ist das 1. Glied dicht und lang behaart. Das 2. Glied ist weniger als halb so lang wie das erste und annähernd stabförmig, in LA etwas bauchig. Der Phallus ist lang und schlank, die Parameren sind einfache, basal gekrümmte, spitze Stäbe, etwas kürzer als der Phallus. – Von zahlreichen ähnlichen Arten kann man diese sofort durch den VA der UA mit dem inneren Zahn unterscheiden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGenital Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207