MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931136030 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16755402

Mystonectes panaminti

2025· article· en· W6931136030 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaInstarLarvaThorax (insect anatomy)Table (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Description of instar III larva of M. panaminti (Fall, 1923) (Figs 3–15) Source of material. The larvae studied were collected ex societate imaginis (Fig. 2) at the following locality: USA: California. Inyo Co.: Death Valley National Park, Badwater Basin, off Badwater Road, ca. 27 km south of California Route 190, 11.iv.1999, 36°13.801′N 116°46.064′W, 15 instar III, Y.Alarie leg. The identification was safe as M. panaminti is the only dytiscid collected at that location. Diagnosis: Instar III larva of M. panaminti can readily be distinguished from that of M. coelamboides by its smaller size, HL = 0.88–0.95 mm, HW = 0.65–0.71 mm, U1 = 1.98–2.20 mm (Table 1), lesser number of secondary setae along anteroventral margin of metafemur (<12) and metafemur as a whole (<42) (Table 2), and narrower abdomen (Fig. 3). Body (Fig. 3): Measurements and ratios that characterize the body shape are shown in Table 1. Head (Figs 4–13): HL = 0.88–0.95 mm, HW = 0.65–0.71 mm, FRL = 0.67–0.72 mm, OCW = 0.43–0.48 mm; ventroapical margin of frontoclypeus with 31–35 spatulate setae [= lamellae clypeales of Bertrand (1972)]. Thorax (Figs 3, 14–15): L3 = 2.47–2.68 mm. Abdomen (Figs 3, 5–6): LAS (Fig. 5) = 0.32–0.33 mm. Urogomphus (Fig. 6). U1 = 1.98–2.20 mm, U1+ U2 = 2.20–2.50 mm, U1/U2 = 5.79–7.27. Chaetotaxy: Lateroventral margin of PA with 6–8 secondary spine-like setae (Fig. 4); secondary leg setation detailed in Table 2 and Figs 14–15. Ecology: Adult and larval specimens of M. panaminti (Figs 2–3) were collected from water slowly flowing below salt crust. Distribution: So far only known from Death Valley National Park, California, USA (Zimmerman & Smith 1975).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→