Bibliographic record
Abstract
spinicornis (Loew), 1866: 181 (Cent. 6, No. 86) (Tetanocera) [Cresson 1920: 68] HT: ♀ MCZC, No. MCZT_13224 [examined by Fisher & Orth 1972b: 178. They stated, “The female specimen from the Museum of Comparative Zoology that we presume to be Loew’s type bears the following data: on a red label “Type 13224,” on a blue label “56/226,” on a white label “ Tetanocera spinicornis.” No locality is given, but we assume it is the specimen from Cuba cited by Loew (1866; 1872 republished)” (emphasis added)]. Also examined by LK 1977. DIST: CUBA (holotype, specific locality unknown). GUATEMALA (Alta Verapaz: Cobán; Totonicapán: San Cristóbal Totonicapán). JAMAICA (Portland: Port Antonio). MEXICO (Chiapas: Lomatán; Ciudad de México:Acolman de Nezahualcóyotl (Tepexpam); Jalisco:Ixtlahuacan; Michoacán:Pataquero; Oaxaca: Oaxaca; Puebla: Cholula; Veracruz). PUERTO RICO. Also CANADA (Nova Scotia) and UNITED STATES (Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia). Map: Fisher & Orth 1972b FIGS: Fisher & Orth 1972b (♂ ♀ terminalia), Knutson & Vala 2011 (wing), this paper (habitus, antenna, lateral head) BIOL: Neff & Berg 1962. BG: 4; PG: 1(?) (and 2?) HOSTS/PREY OF LARVAE: First-instar larvae fed only on the semiterrestrial pulmonate snails Catinella avara and Oxyloma retusa; second- and third-instar larvae fed on the above two species plus the freshwater pulmonate snails Galba humilis and Helisoma trivolvis and the terrestrial pulmonate snails Cochlicopa lubrica, Discus cronkhitei, and Zonitoides arboreus IMMATS: Neff & Berg 1962 (E, L1–L3, P) CHR: Boyes et al. 1969 (karyotype) MOL_DAT: Y
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".