Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pilophorus choii Josifov, 1978 (Figs 1A, 11A, 14 A–D) Pilophorus choii Josifov, 1978: 285 (n. sp., desc.); Schuh, 2002 –2013, online catalog; Duwal et al., 2014: 261 (redesc., key); Aukema, 2018, online catalog; Yamamoto & Yasunaga, 2020: 75 (faunal list). Material examined. JAPAN: Hokkaido: Otaru City, Estuary of Shinkawa River, N43.165, E141.227, on Quercus dentata, 18 Aug 2007, A.Yamamoto, 1♀ (OMO); Otaru City, Tarukawa-9-sen, 43.186, 141.269, on Quercus dentata, 6 Aug 2009, A. Yamamoto, 1♂ (OMO). Kyushu: Oita Pref., Handa Plateau, 33.13, 131.22, 27 Jul 1995, Y. Nakatani, 1♂ (NIAES) (AMNH _ PBI 00380663). KOREA: Gyeonggi-do, Yangpyeonggun, Mt. Youngmun, UV light trap, 16 Jul 2009, R.K. Duwal & S. Jung, 1♂ (SNU). Rediagnosis. Recognized by its moderate size; short antennal segment that is shorter than basal width of pronotum(see Table 1 for measurements of male); polished, shiny pronotum; partly interrupted, narrow median stripe of scale-like setae that are easily rubbed off (Fig. 1A); narrowly clustered scale-like setae at anterior inner corner of cuneus; and C-shaped, small-sized male endosoma (Fig. 11A). Dorsal habitus images available on https:// www.discoverlife.org/20/q?search= Pilophorus +choii. Biology. The Japanese population were found to inhabit Quercus dentata, as reported for Korea (Duwal et al., 2014) and Russian Primorsky Territory (Kerzhner, 1988). A univoltine life cycle is assumed for P. choii and the eggs presumably hibernate. Discussion. This species is most similar in external appearance to P. lucidus as both are associated with deciduous Quercus trees and have the similar size, short antennal segment II and shiny polished pronotum; however, the characters provided in the above key (couplet 25) will readily distinguish them. Since only a few specimens of P. choii are currently available from Japan, its food preference or predation is yet to be tested. Fukuda et al. (2020) and Miyazaki et al. (2020) documented that the immature forms of P. lucidus, assumed to be one of the closest relative of P. choii, could develop into adults when feeding on dried red worms and brine-shrimp eggs as a diet. Therefore, P. choii is also supposed to have a carnivorous food habit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".