Pteronarcys princeps Banks 1907
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pteronarcys princeps Banks, 1907 http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera.speciesfile.org: TaxonName:470666 (Figs. 45–49) Remarks and Distribution. This species is common in the Pacific Northwest with scattered reports from British Columbia, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah (Jewett 1959, Baumann et al. 1977, Stewart & Oswood 2006). It is sympatric with P. californica, but can be differentiated by the anterolateral orientation of the APP (Figs. 47, 49) and the semi-circular ridge shaped supra-antennal plate (Figs. 46, 48). Material Examined. Canada, British Columbia: Cultus Lake, 13 March 1937, 3 L, W.E. Ricker (CNC); Hatchery Creek, Cultus Lake BC, 7 May 1937, ♀, Exv, W.E. Ricker (CNC). USA, California: Butte Co., Butte Creek, Humboldt Rd., above Colby Creek, N 40.1138 W 121.4952, 25 May 2014, 2♂, 3L, B.C. Kondratieff & C. Verdone (CSUIC); Butte Creek, Humboldt Rd. NW of Butte Meadows, N 40.0016, W 121.5364, 25 May 2014, 4♂, Exv, B.C. Kondratieff & C. Verdone (CSUIC); Nevada Co., Rock Creek, North Bloomfield Rd., N 39.3024, W 120.9785, 24 May 2014, 4♀, Exv, B.C. Kondratieff & C. Verdone (CSUIC); Siskiyou Co., Big Springs Creek, Mt. Shasta City Park, N 41.3281, W 122.3269, 23 May 2014, 6♂, 2♀, 2L, Exv, B.C. Kondratieff & C. Verdone (CSUIC); Oregon: Clackamas Co., Salmon River, submerged wood, 1 mi. W of Zig Zag, 27 December 1995, L, R. Durfee (CSUIC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".