Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liriomyza pistilla Lonsdale (Fig. 149) Material examined. MASSACHUSETTS: Franklin Co., Sunderland, Mt. Toby, 27.vi.2014, em. by 15.vii.2014, N. D. Charney, ex Melampyrum lineare, #CSE1183, CNC384842–384844 (3♂); Hampshire Co., Pelham, Butter Hill Wildlife Sanctuary, 2.vi.2015, em. 20–23.vi.2015, C.S. Eiseman, ex Melampyrum lineare, #CSE1635, CNC564685–564689 (3♂ 2♀); Nantucket Co., Nantucket, Masquetuck, 11.vi.2013, em. 26–30.vi.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Melampyrum lineare, #CSE610, CNC422920–422923 (1♂ 3♀). Host. Orobanchaceae: Melampyrum lineare Desr. Leaf mine. (Fig. 149) Whitish, upper surface; initially narrow and linear, then forming a blotch that may obliterate the linear portion. Frass is in scattered grains and short strips. The mines from Mt. Toby were rather different from others we have seen, consisting of long, linear mines contorted to form secondary blotches, with frass in alternating beaded strips. Puparium. Yellowish; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: MA, NC; Canada: AB, BC, NS, ON, QC. Comments. This is presumably the species responsible for the unidentified linear-blotch mine on Melampyrum lineare that Spencer (1969) reported from Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".