Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) montanus Chant & Yoshida-Shaul, 1978: 1065
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) montanus Chant & Yoshida-Shaul Typhlodromus montanus Chant & Yoshida-Shaul, 1978: 1065. (Figures 12–17) Female (n=2). Dorsum (Figure 12). Dorsal setal pattern 12A:8A (r3 and R1 off shield). Dorsal shield, sclerotised, strongly reticulated, with waist at level of seta R1. Bearing four pairs of solenostomes (gd2, gd6, gd8 and gd9) and fourteen pairs of poroids (sensilla). Muscle-marks (sigilla) visible mostly on podosoma, length of dorsal shield 366 (364– 367), width (at level of s4) 189 (187–191), width (at level of S2) 194 (190–197). Dorsal setae smooth, except Z5, which slightly serrated. Measurements of dorsal setae as follows: j1 22 (21–22), j3 27 (26–27), j4 14 (13–15), j5 15 (14–15), j6 18, J2 19, J5 5, z2 19, z3 22 (21–23), z4 20 (19–21), z5 15 (14–15), Z4 27 (26–28), Z5 57, s4 25 (24–25), s6 27 (26–27), S2 26 (25–27), S4 23 (22–23), S5 17 (16–17), r3 25 and R1 24 (23–24). Peritreme. Short, extending to between setae z3–z4. Venter (Figure 13). Ventral setal pattern 15:JV:ZV. Sternal shield smooth, lightly sclerotised; with two pairs of setae (ST1 and ST2) and two pairs of pores (iv1 and iv2); length (ST1–ST2) 41 (40–42), width (distance between setae ST2) 60; setae ST3 situated on separate platelets; metasternal setae ST4 and pair of pores (iv3) on metasternal shields. Genital shield smooth, width at level of genital setae (ST5) 63 (61–64), para-genital poroids iv5 on integument. Ventrianal shield pentagonal, striated. Four pairs of pre-anal setae (JV1, JV2, JV3 and ZV2), seta ZV2 out of shield on left side; and pair of widely separated and small rounded solenostomes (gv3) posteromesad setae JV3, distance between pre-anal pores 54 (53–54). Pair of para-anal (Pa) and post-anal setae (Pst) present. Length of ventrianal shield 114 (113–115), width at level of setae ZV2 101 (99–102). Setae ZV1, ZV3, JV4, JV5 and four pairs of poroids on integument surrounding ventrianal shield. Setae JV5 smooth, 34 (33–34) in length. Gnathosoma. Anterior margin of epistome rounded and smooth. Hypostomal groove with seven transverse rows of denticles, each row with two or three teeth; subcapitular setae h1 19 (18–19), h2 19 (18–19) and h3 18, slightly shorter than palp coxal setae (pc) 23 (22–23). Chaetotaxy of palps similar to new species described above. Chelicera (Figure 14). Fixed digit 28 (27–28) long, with five teeth and pilus dentilis; movable digit 27 (26–27) long with one tooth. Spermatheca (Figure 15). Calyx bell-shaped, flaring distally, 13 (12–13) in length; atrium incorporated within calyx. Legs (Figures 16, 17). Length of legs (base of coxae to base of claws): leg I 301 (294–307); leg II 262 (259– 265); leg III 273 (272–274); leg IV 342 (339–344). Chaetotaxy of legs similar to new species except genu II 2 2/0 2/0 1. Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I with five modified setae with different shapes. Leg IV with one blunttip macroseta, knob absent, StIV 45 (44–45). Other legs without macrosetae. Male. Unknown. World distribution. Canada (Chant & Yoshida-Shaul, 1978), and Russia (this study). Material examined. Two females Pereval Seminskiy, Altai Republic, Russia (51° 02′ N, 85° 36′ E, and 1744 m above sea level). 3 August 2020, V.A. Khaustov coll., from European birdcherry plants, Prunus padus L. (Rosaceae) heavily infested with eriophyid mites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".