Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta skraelingia (Herrich-Schäffer) Figs 1–3, 136, 194. Map 1 Phlogophora skraelingia Herrich-Schäffer, 1852: 57. Lasionycta skraelingia; Aurivillius 1892b: 285. Mamestra skraelingia; Staudinger and Rebel 1901: 159. Lasionycta scraelingia; Hampson 1905: 56. Invalid emendation. Lasionycta skroelingia; Warren 1910: 85. Misspelling. Hada skraelingia; Hartig and Heinicke 1973: 193. Lasionycta skraelingia; Lafontaine et al. 1986: 255. Type material. Type : lost. Th e original description is suffi cient to characterize the species (Lafontaine and Kononenko 1988). Type locality: Lapland. Diagnosis. Lasionycta skraelingia is distinguished from L. taigata Lafontaine by its undulating antemedial line (irregular in L. taigata) and more even gray forewing (mottled in L. taigata). The cucullus of the male valve is larger in L. skraelingia than in L. taigata, and the digitus is very short. Th e female genitalia are similar, but the appendix bursae of L. skraelingia is shorter than that of L. taigata. Th e CO1 sequence of L. skraelingia is identical to one of several L. taigata haplotypes. Distribution and biology. Lasionycta skraelingia is Holarctic, occurring from Scandinavia to northwestern North America. In North America this species is known from three specimens from Windy Pass, Ogilvie Mountains, Yukon. Th e adults are crepuscular and fly rapidly over small spruces. Th ey are collected by hand netting, rarely if ever coming to a light. Dates are from late June to early July. In Scandinavia the species is polyphagous when reared and has been fed on Betula nana L. (Betulaceae), Polygonum aviculare L. (Polygonaceae), and Vaccinium uligonosum L. (Ericaceae) (Ahola and Silvonen 2008). Th ese authors report that Eurasian populations are biennial, likely also the case in North America. The Yukon specimens were been collected in two odd-numbered years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".