Bibliographic record
Abstract
Syntemna Winnertz, 1863 Syntemna Winnertz, 1863: 767. DIAGNOSIS: Mediotergite bare; laterotergites setose; wing membrane with macrotrichia; Sc meets R; radial cell very small, subquadrate; base of M 3+4 and CuA fork proximal to base of M 1 and M 2 fork; segment 7 of abdomen reduced. TYPE SPECIES: S. morosa Winnertz, 1863: 767, by monotypy. COMMENTS: About 20 extant species are known from the Holarctic (Zaitzev, 1994), with an additional 12 species described from Baltic amber (Meunier, 1904, 1917a, 1922) and 4 from the Lower and Upper Cretaceous of northeast Asia (Blagoderov, 1995, 1998a, 2000). Syntemna fissurata, new species Figures 39, 40, Plate 4C DIAGNOSIS: Sc ends at R at the base of RS; R 4 present; crossvein rm 0.5Χ length of M3 section; base of fork of M 3+4 and CuA proximal to the base of M 1 and M 2 fork. DESCRIPTION: Body length = 3.06 mm, wing length = 2.28 mm. Head not fully visible. Flagellum 14segmented, flagellomeres barrelshaped, length of each 1.5Χ the width, setose, length of setae about equal to flagellomere width. Thorax: Scutum with strong, long setae in lateral, dorsocentral, and acrostichal rows, with short setulae. Antepronotum, proepisternum, laterotergites, and me diotergite setose. Wing membrane with microtrichia and short macrotrichia. Costa ends beyond the tip of R 5, onefourth distance between tips of R 5 and M 1. Sc meets R just before base of RS. Sections of RS1 and RS2 equal and 1.5Χ length of rm. Crossvein rm 0.5Χ length of M3 section. Fork of M 1 and M 2 3.5Χ length of its stem (M3). Base of fork of M 3+4 and CuA proximal to the base of M2 section. Legs: Inner surface of mid tibia with fissurelike sensory pit in apical third. Tarsal claws with two short teeth at the base. Abdomen setose, with 7 visible segments, 7th one very small. Cerci 2segment ed, basal segment roundish, with numerous long trichia; apical segment bacilliform, with length twice the width, bare. Lateral lobes of 8th sternite setulose. MATERIAL: Holotype TMPD P83.15.3.8, female. Canada: Alberta, Grassy Lake, coll. T. Pike ETYMOLOGY: The species epithet is the Latin word fissures, meaning ‘‘full of cracks’’, in reference to the state of preservation of the specimen. COMMENTS: The new species differs from all other known Mesozoic species in having section M3 long, at least twice the length of crossvein rm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".