Cybaeina confusa Chamberlin and Ivie

Cybaeina confusa Chamberlin and Ivie Figs 3–4, 8–9, 19–21, 28 Cybaeina confusa Chamberlin and Ivie 1942: 19, fig. 38. Roth 1952: 195, figs 1, 3, 6. Roewer 1954: 86. Roth and Brame 1972: 16, figs 21–22. Roth and Brown 1986: 2. Bennett 2005: 88, figs 22.19, 22.24, 22.27, 22.30, 22.32–22.33. Bennett 2017: 99, figs 23.19, 23.24, 23.27, 23.30, 23.32–23.33. World Spider Catalog 2023. Type material examined. U.S.A.: Oregon: Holotype female. Benton County, base of Mount Chintimini [Marys Peak], 11.ix.1912, Ewing (AMNH). Other material examined. CAN: British Columbia: 1♁, Banks Is., Kooryet Creek, 5–30 m, 53.342°N 129.884°W, 11.viii.1986, D.H. & J.L. Kavanaugh (CAS); 1♀, Kunghit Is., Rose Harbour, 6.viii.1961 (CNC); 2♀, Moresby Is., Deena Creek / Neena Creek divide, 53.102°N 132.253°W, 28.vii.2009, R. Bennett, C. Copley, & D. Copley (RBCM); 1♁, Port Renfrew, Botanical Beach, 18.viii.1985, R.G. Bennett (CNC). U.S.A.: Oregon: Benton, 1♀, Marys Peak at Gravel Ck., 3000’, 17.vi.1949, F. Beer (CAS); 2♀, Wren, 19.ix.1950, V.D. Roth (CAS); Douglas, 1♀, Anlauf, 2.v.1951, V.D. Roth (CAS); Lane, 1♁, H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest [nr. Blue River], 25.vi.1982, J.D. McIver (OSU); 1♀, 7 mi. S of Cottage Grove, 29.vi.1953, V.D. Roth (BMNH); Linn, 1♁ 1♀, Cascadia, 5.ix.1948, V.D. Roth (CAS); 1♁, Santiam R., 9.vi.1912, Ewing AMNH); 2♀, 1 mi. E of Quartzville, 27 mi. NE of Sweet Home, 7.iii.1948, V.D. Roth (CAS); Tillamook, 1♁, Boyer, 21.viii.1938, J.C. Dirks (AMNH). Diagnosis. The presence of four pairs of elongate macrosetae ventrally on tibia I will usually serve to distinguish males and females of C. confusa from those of C. dixoni spec. nov. and C. minuta (which usually have five pairs). Furthermore, the males of C. confusa are distinguished by the form of the pedipalpal patellar, tibial, and tegular apophyses (Figs 3–4, 8–9): the patellar apophysis is relatively long (length about 1/2 to nearly as long as width of the patella) and has three or four peg setae distally, the medial component of the retrolateral tibial apophysis terminates in a single basally articulated macroseta, and the tip of the distal arm of the tegular apophysis is dorsad, flattened, and broad. In the males of C. dixoni spec. nov. (Figs 5, 10–11, 14–15) and C. minuta (Figs 6–7, 12–13, 16–17) the patellar apophysis is short (less than 1/2 width of patella) with two (C. minuta) or up to nine (C. dixoni spec. nov.) peg setae, the medial component of the retrolateral tibial apophysis terminates distally with an acuminate process, and the tip of the distal arm of the tegular apophysis is prolaterad (C. minuta) or distad (C. dixoni spec. nov.), folded over longitudinally, and narrow. Females of C. confusa (Figs 20–21) are further distinguished by the similar diameter of the spermathecal stalks and bases (rendering the stalks and bases difficult to differentiate) and the copulatory ducts being U-shaped in dorsal view. In females of C dixoni spec. nov. (Figs 26–27) and C. minuta (Figs 23–24) the spermathecal bases are bulbous (as in many Cybaeinae) and easily differentiated from the spermathecal stalks and in dorsal view the copulatory ducts tightly encircle the spermathecal stalks and are not U-shaped. Description. As in diagnosis and description of the genus and the diagnosis of this species.Additional descriptive characters presented here. This species described in detail by Roth (1952). Male: (n=6). Medial component of retrolateral tibial apophysis (Figs 8–9) a low ridge terminated distally with single basally articulated macroseta. Proximal arm of tegular apophysis (Figs 3–4) simple, elongate, slightly twisted, anterodorsad. Measurements (n=6). CL 1.80–2.15 (1.95), CW 1.36–1.88 (1.58), SL 0.96–1.20 (1.05), SW 0.90–1.04 (0.98). Female: (n=12). Atrium (Fig. 19) with a single opening located posteromedially on epigyne. Vulva (Figs 20– 21) with copulatory ducts contiguous for short distance anterior of atrium before turning posteriorly, diverging, looping dorsally around spermathecal stalks and joining spermathecal heads at anterior end of vulva; spermathecal heads, stalks, and bases undifferentiated but becoming gradually narrower posteriorly; primary pores on dorsal and ventral surfaces of heads; Bennett’s glands difficult to discern, apparently hidden within coils of spermathecal ducts just anterior to posterior-most portion of copulatory ducts. Measurements (n=8). CL 1.50–2.30 (1.85), CW 1.13–1.70 (1.41), SL 0.89–1.30 (1.06), SW 0.78–1.12 (0.94). Holotype CL 2.03, CW 1.55, SL 1.17, SW 1.04. Distribution and natural history. (Fig. 28). Cybaeina confusa is relatively widespread but uncommonly encountered within the coastal western Nearctic area and may be comprised of two or more disjunct populations. It has been recorded from coastal British Columbia, Canada, and the Willamette Valley area of northwestern Oregon, U.S.A. but is unknown in the well-collected area between British Columbia and Oregon in Washington, U.S.A. Males have been collected from early June to early September and the most recent known record of C. confusa is from 2009. This species is ranked nationally vulnerable in Canada (Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council 2022); a conservation rank for this species in the U.S.A. has not been determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.