MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931217532 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5578560

Metacrinus berthei

2021· article· en· W6931217532 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStalkFragment (logic)Type (biology)Genus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metacrinus berthei (Nicolas, 1897) Figs. 4–5 (morphotype B), 6, 8–12A–C; Tables 5–7 Synonymy. Pentacrinus berthei Nicolas, 1897: 79–80, fig. 12; Pentacrinus miocenicus de Loriol, 1897: 127–129 pars., figs. 15–16; Pentacrinus berthei Nicolas, 1898: 396–398, fig. 1; Pentacrinus berthae Lambert, 1899: 122; Pentacrinus berthei Biese and Sieverts-Doreck, 1939: 45. Type material. The original description (Nicolas 1897) is based on a type series comprising 1 distal stalk fragment (Fig. 8A–B), 2 Plc (Fig. 8E–F) and 2 isolated IN (Fig. 8C–D). There was no indication of the original collector. The Nicolas collection housed at UCBL-FSL comprises 2/3 of the stalk fragment (UCBL-FSL 19.099 - 1) (Fig. 8B) and 1 Plc (UCBL-FSL 19.099 - 2) (Fig. 8F). In the Châtelet collection housed at the Requien Museum in Avignon, we found the proximal third of the stalk fragment (MRA 3.009.192) (Fig. 7A) and the two isolated IN (MRA 3.009.194.1-2). The stalk fragment (Fig. 8A +B) is here designated as syntype 1, the Plc (Fig. 8F) as syntype 2, the first isolated IN (Fig. 8C) as syntype 3, and the second (Figs. 8D, 9A) as syntype 4. The syntype 5 (Fig. 8E) can be considered lost. Etymology. Nicolas dedicated this species to Berthe Sinard who firstly suggested that the Miocene environment at Les Angles was deeper than previously interpreted (Sinard 1892). Material examined. Les Angles (10 Plc, 21 isolated IN, 2 N); Avignon (111 Plc, 613 isolated IN, 49 isolated N, numerous Br and Ci), Le Barroux (9 Plc, 1 IN); Beaucaire (4 Plc, 10 isolated IN), Entrechaux Ferme Pie (2 Plc, 25 isolated IN, 1 N), Entrechaux Pont Saint-Michel (1 IN), Notre-Dame du Château (22 Plc, 19 isolated IN, 2 isolated N), Picabrier (15Plc, 106 isolated IN, 17 isolated N), Vedènes (1 Plc, 12 isolated IN, Brs), Tarascon (9 Plc). Type stratum. Late Burdigalian. Type-locality. Ancient quarries, Les Angles (Gard). Emended diagnosis. Pentagonal columnals with often rounded edges, most proximal internodals and nodals slightly star-shaped, frequent inter-articular pores; maximum diameter 6.7 mm, often very variable height within one nodotaxis even distally, maximum number of internodals per nodotaxis 19, average 16–17; symplexies with closed petaloid zones separated by marked grooves, number of crenulae per petaloid zone 15–16 rarely 17, crenulae of about the same size, ligament areas usually twice as long as wide (often less); nodals with oval cirrus sockets not exceeding their height; cryptosymplexy with regular symmorphy often marked and discrete marginal crenularium, facets without interpetaloid furrow; ornamentation absent or discrete, sometimes small knob or ridge at mid-height giving a more rounded to subcircular columnal section. Primibrachiales in number equal or superior to 6 with large pinnular sockets, IBr1+2 synostosis with aboral marginal crenularium, IBr3+4 synostosis smooth with aboral growth lines. Description of syntypes. Distal stalk fragments, IN pentagonal or subpentagonal, N slightly starry. Syntype 1: L 47.4 mm composed of 1 complete Ndx of 19 IN (L 30.5 mm) + 1 incomplete Ndx of 15 IN (Fig. 8A–B), Ndx with marked curvature, no inter-articular pores, proximal end of complete Ndx with smooth, slightly convex infraN facet, N with 4 cirrals connected; internodal D reaching 6.5 mm proximally and decreasing to 6.2 mm at distal end; proximal Ndx with higher IN alternating with slightly lower IN of similar D; nodal H reaching a maximum of 2.2 mm; smaller differences in intermodal H in distal Ndx; smooth and slightly convex columnal side faces. Syntypes 2 and 5: incomplete curved Ndx (8 and 13 IN respectively) with distal N, similar in morphology to syntype 1, differences in H and D between IN more pronounced in syntype 2 (Fig. 8F). Syntypes 3 and 4 (Fig. 8C–D): IN with the same characters (D 6.1 mm, H/D 0.26, maximum Cr/PZ 17), syntype 4 moderately star-shaped with PZ still slightly open (Fig. 9A). Other specimens from Les Angles. Plc with at most 7 IN; 60% of symplexies with 16 Cr/PZ, only one case with 17, all PZ closed, internal crenularium poorly differentiated, cryptosymplexy preservation not allowing a detailed description. Quantitative characters including type series in Table 7. Specimens from Notre-Dame du Château. Quantitative characters including 2 Plc from type series of Pentacrinus miocenicus (de Loriol 1897, figs. 15–16) given in Table 7; most Co pentagonal; Plc with maximum of 14 successive IN, ~50% with inter-articular pores more or less marked; most proximal Plc (de Loriol 1897, fig. 16) with columnal H markedly unequal, inter-articular pores widely open, IN star-shaped and a single N without cryptosymplexy despite cirrus sockets being well-developed; another proximal Plc (de Loriol 1897, fig. 15) more distal with IN becoming subpentagonal (Fig. 9B–C); oval cirrus sockets 1.7 times wider than high and tangential to N facet borders (Fig. 9D); all Co with smooth sides. Symplexies most often (62%) with 15–16 Cr/PZ, PZ closed, inner crenularium poorly differentiated. Distal N facet (cryptosymplexy) smooth, slightly concave with 7–8 small marginal Cr/PZ. Specimens from Avignon. Exceptional variety of Br types preserved (Fig. 10); 9 IBr identified with maximum D 5.17 mm (mean 4.3 mm), muscular synarthries with moderately developed muscle areas and fulcral ridge perpendicular to dorso-ventral axis (Fig. 10C–D), IBr1+2 synostosis with narrow marginal symplexial crenularium (Fig. 10A–B), IBr2 with proximal synostosial facet slightly convex and bearing a large pinnule socket (Fig. 10D–E), IBr4+5 synostosis with aboral growth lines underlined by a thicker stereom (Fig. 10G, J); all Brax with proximal muscular synarthry, fulcral ridges of distal synarthries forming acute angle (Fig. 10H), IBrax with 0.65 0.5 having subcircular section and symplexies of open PZ (Fig. 12C), N with ligament areas wide (Fig. 11E), cirrus sockets subcircular and occupying only 2/3 of nodal H (Fig. 11D); cirrus sockets becoming more oval with growth (Fig. 11C) and tangential to nodal facet borders (Fig. 13J); 1 N abnormal with only a single cirrus socket; ~50% of symplexial facets having IPZ with narrow and well-marked grooves extended to inner crenularium (Fig. 11G); cryptosymplexies often well preserved, distal N facet (Fig. 11J) moderately concave with a more or less developed marginal crenularium, proximal infraN facet (Fig. 11K) convex with more attenuated marginal crenularium and IPZ without axial groove, axial canal filled by dense secondary stereom with a 5-lobed secondary lumen (Fig. 11L); two Plc having symplexies with four PZ, one of irregular subcircular section (Fig. 12A), the other of quadrangular section (Fig. 12B). Specimens from other sites. In Beaucaire, Co and Plc belonging to individuals of sizes like in Avignon (see Table 6), one complete Ndx 13.3 mm long with 13 IN; qualitative characters as in Avignon except side faces smooth without ornamentation. In Tarascon, Plc with maximum of 10 successive IN, 5.16<D<7.00 and 0.15<H/D<0.55, ~50% of symplexies with conspicuous furrow at the IPZ axis, external morphology very close to Plc from Les Angles. Among 9 Plc from Le Barroux, 2 with N located at middle length (Fig. 9E), only 1 Plc with 8 successive IN, longest Plc with discrete inter-articular pores and IN of various D and H; symplexies with 13 to 16 Cr/ZP; all pentagonal IN with more or less convex external faces; N with cirrus sockets 1.6 times wider than high with two well-developed culminae (Fig. 9E); 1 N with 4 cirrus sockets. In Picabrier (quantitative characters given in Table 5), symplexies most often (52%) with 15–16 Cr/PZ, two Plc with 10 successive IN; most IN with qualitative characters (Fig. 11F–I) identical to those in Avignon, ~30% of IN with lateral faces more convex in center and more prominent angles (Fig. 11H–J), sometimes forming rougher angles on some Plc (Fig. 11K); cryptosymplexies rarely well-preserved, symmorphy of variable amplitude, patches of denser stereom in place of symplexal crenularium pre-existing articulation ankylosis, ZIP without axial grooves (Fig. 9J). Co from other sites with Co characters entering in main field of variation of those from Picabrier. One IBrax (possibly IBr4ax) with proximal synostosial facet from Vedène. Remarks. The two species P. berthei and P. miocenicus were published in the same year of 1897. Pentacrinus berthei was based on distal stalk fragments that clearly distinguish it from the species gastaldii, one of them with a complete Ndx, while the type-series of P. miocenicus contains specimens belonging to two different species. In addition, the two Plcs belonging to berthei figured by de Loriol (1897) are very proximal showing symplexies with specific characters incompletely developed. Therefore, we have given priority to the species whose type-series allows an unambiguous determination. Nicolas (1897, 1898) refers to another species, Pentacrinus allardi, found in Avignon molasse and from Beaucaire. Without description or figuration, it remains a nomen nudum. It most p

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207