MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931218946 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337931

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) testaceum

2020· article· en· W6931218946 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalictidaeLotusBristol-Myers

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) testaceum (Robertson, 1897) Figs 84, 90O, 96A, 98A Halictus testaceus Robertson, 1897: 323 (lectotype designated by W.E. LaBerge in Webb 1980, ♀, deposited in INHS, examined). Halictus (Chloralictus) scrophulariae Cockerell, 1906: 428 (holotype, ♀, deposited in USNM, examined; synonymy by Gibbs 2011). Halictus (Chloralictus) occultus Sandhouse, 1924: 27 (holotype, ♂, deposited in USNM, examined; name preoccupied due to primary homonymy with Halictus occultus Vachal, 1904). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) sandhouseae Michener, 1951: 1117 (catalog, replacement name for H. (C.) occultus Sandhouse, 1924; synonymy by Gibbs 2011). Chloralictus testaceus – Robertson 1902 b: 249 (key). Halictus (Chloralictus) scrophulariae – Sandhouse 1924: 4 (key). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) scrophulariae – Michener 1951: 1117 (catalog). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) testaceum – Michener 1951: 1118 (catalog). Dialictus sandhouseae – Mitchell 1960: 418, fig. 102 (key, redescription). — Hurd 1979: 1971 (catalog). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 129 (catalog). Dialictus testaceus – Mitchell 1960: 424 (key, redescription). — Hurd 1979: 1972 (catalog). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 135 (catalog). Dialictus scrophulariae – Hurd 1979: 1971 (catalog). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 129 (catalog). Lasioglossum (Dialictus) sandhouseae – Krombein 1967: 466 (catalogue). Lasioglossum testaceum – Donovall & van Engeldorp 2010: 18 (checklist). Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) testaceum – Gibbs 2010: 42, fig. 9b (key). — Scott et al. 2011: 32 (checklist). Lasioglossum (Dialictus) testaceum – Wolf & Ascher 2009: 144 (checklist). — Gibbs 2011: 197, figs 213–217 (key, redescription). Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum testaceum are readily identified by the propodeum with strong dorsoventral and oblique carinae, and T1 with sparse erect hairs and no acarinarial fan. This combination is unique among Nearctic L. (Dialictus) except for L. rufulipes (Cockerell, 1938), which has a dark metasoma, T4 with sparser tomentum, and a boreal distribution, and L. aquilae, which has the metasoma dark metallic green. Males of L. testaceum can be recognized by the face short (length/width ratio ~0.81), clypeus apical half pale yellow, propodeum dorsolateral slope and posterior face rugose, propodeum lateral face smooth and tessellate, and retrorse lobe very narrow. They are most similar to L. zephyrus and L. pictum. Both of these species have the clypeus apical margin dark or much more narrowly yellow, retrorse lobes much broader, and face slightly longer. In addition, males of L. pictum have the scutum and mesepisternum with larger and denser punctures (i=1–2 pd) and propodeum lateral face rugulose. Etymology Robertson (1897) named this species with the Latin adjective ‘ testaceus ’ (brick-like). Material examined Lectotype UNITED STATES – Illinois • ♀; Macoupin Co., Carlinville; [39.28° N, 89.88° W]; 11 Apr. 1896; C. Robertson leg.; INHS. Other material CANADA – Alberta • 1 ♀; Writing-On-Stone Prov. Pk.; [49.09° N, 111.62° W]; 26 May–6 Jun. 1990; D. McCorquodale leg.; WRME. – British Columbia • 1 ♂; 5 mi. S of Hedley; [49.29° N, 120.04° W]; 24 Jul. 1985; Finnamore and Thormin leg.; PMAE. UNITED STATES – Colorado • 2 ♀♀; Alamosa Co., 4 mi. SW of Alamosa (intersection 370 and S106); 37.42738° N, 105.92846° W; 2301 m a.s.l.; 25 May 2001; Va. Scott leg.; ex Salix (staminate); UCMC • 1 ♀; El Paso Co., Ramah; [39.12° N, 104.17° W]; 15 Jun. 1971; Michener and Schorr leg.; ex Salix sp.; SEMC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 15 Jun. 1971; C. Michener and R. Schorr leg.; ex Salix; SEMC • 2 ♀♀; Fremont Co., 5 mi. SW of Coaldale; [38.31° N, 105.82° W]; 10 Jun. 1971; C. Michener and R. Schorr leg.; ex Salix; SEMC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 10 Jun. 1971; C. Michener and R. Schorr leg.; ex Rhus trilobata; SEMC • 2 ♀♀; Fremont Co., Coaldale; [38.37° N, 105.76° W]; 11 Jun. 1971; C. Michener and R. Schorr leg.; ex Salix; SEMC • 1 ♀; Jackson Co., Lake John; 40.7862° N, 106.4692° W; 2461 m a.s.l.; 27 Jun. 2014; T. McIntyre and F.D. Parker leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Park Co., N. Fk. S. Platte R., 0.2 mi. E of Bailey; [39.404° N, 105.47° W]; 11 Jun. 1988; E. Bergey leg.; CSUC • 1 ♂; Routt Co., 4 mi. E of Clark; [40.71° N, 106.84° W]; 29 Aug. 1979; U.N. Lanham leg.; ex Solidago; UCMC • 1 ♀; Teller Co., S base of Blue Mtn., nr Florissant; [38.923° N, 105.327° W]; 2568 m a.s.l.; 1 Aug. 1966; T. Emmel and M. Fosdick leg.; LACM • 1 ♀; Weld Co., 2–4 mi. W of Orchard; [40.33° N, 104.18° W]; 14 May 1992; M.G. Galindo and R.S. Beal leg.; ex Salix; CSUC • 3 ♂♂; 8 mi. NW of Steamboat Spgs.; [40.57° N, 106.94° W]; 28 Aug. 1979; U.N. Lanham leg.; ex Solidago; UCMC • 3 ♀♀; 9 mi. N of Arboles; [37.15° N, 107.36° W]; 27 May 1977; U. Lanham and P. Byron leg.; ex Salix; UCMC • 1 ♂; Florissant; [38.95° N, 105.29° W]; 23 Jul. year unknown; Cockerell leg.; ex Potentilla; USNM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 25 Jul. year unknown; Cockerell leg.; ex Scrophularia; USNM. – Minnesota • 1 ♀; 43.7509° N, 91.6541° W; 20 Jun. 2014; S. Leddy leg.; ex Rudbeckia triloba; WRME. – Utah • 1 ♀; Uintah Co., Bonanza; [40.02° N, 109.18° W]; Jul. 1977; G. Bohart leg.; BBSL. – Wyoming • 1 ♀; Lincoln Co., Salt Creek; 42.4667° N, 110.9678° W; 2027 m a.s.l.; 14 Aug. 2014; J.B. Runyon leg.; MTEC. Description See Gibbs (2010) for a complete redescription and figures. Range Rocky Mountains from British Columbia southeast to New Mexico, east through the Great Plains to Illinois (Fig. 84). Floral records ANACARDIACEAE R.Br. Rhus L. R. trilobata Nutt. • APOCYNACEAE Juss. Asclepias L. A. speciosa Torr. (G11) • ASTERACEAE Giseke: Anaphalis (G11) • Nothocalais: N. cuspidata (Pursh) Greene (G11) • Rudbeckia: R. triloba L. • Solidago • Taraxacum (G11) • FABACEAE Juss. Amorpha: A. canescens Pursh (G11) • GROSSULARIACEAE DC. Ribes L. R. valicola Greene (G11) • ONAGRACEAE Juss. Epilobium L. (G11) • POLYGONACEAE Juss. Eriogonum Michx. E. annuum Nutt. (G11) • ROSACEAE Juss. Dasiphora Raf. D. fruticosa (L.) Rydb. (G11) • Potentilla L. • Prunus L. (G11) • Spiraea L. (G11) • SALICACEAE Mirb. Salix L. S. brachycarpa Nutt. (G11) • S. eriocephala Michx. (G11) • SCROPHULARIACEAE Juss. Scrophularia L. DNA barcodes Not available. Lasioglosusm testaceum is morphologically similar to L. rufulipes, for which 3 sequences are available (BOLD process IDs: DLII1138-08, DLII1140-08, DLII1142-08). Barcodes of L. testaceum are expected to be similar to those of L. rufulipes, as these are very likely sister species. Phylogenetic analysis of COI barcodes and other genes of L. rufulipes suggest it is a distinct lineage relatively distantly related from the major clade of New World L. (Dialictus) (Gibbs et al. 2012b; Fig. 7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207