Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synonymy of Gobiopsis liolepis (Bleeker) Callogobius liolepis Bleeker in Koumans 1931:75 [from Bleeker, unpublished, p. 258]. Koumans 1932:14 [description from Bleeker specimens, table of morphometrics and meristics]; Koumans 1940:168, 207 [comparison with C. atratus Griffin = Gobiopsis atrata (Griffin)], 168 [comparison with Gunnamatta insolita Whitley = Callogobius depressus (Ramsay & Ogilby)]; Koumans 1953a:248 [in part, list of C. okinawae of the Snellius Expedition]; Koumans 1953b:97 [in part, description based in part on C. okinawae]; Rangarajan 1968:347, 350– 352, tab. II [following Koumans 1953b, comparison with C. mannarensis, key]; Menon & Chatterjee 1974:127– 128 [comparison with C. andamanensis, key]; Akihito & Meguro 1975:112, table 1 [listing as syntypes, comparison with C. hasseltii (Bleeker) and C. okinawae (Snyder)]; Goren 1979a:43 [key]; Goren 1979b:216, table II [comparison with C. clarki (Goren), data from Koumans 1953b]; Chen & Yu 1986 [listed for Taiwan, basis unknown]; Larson & Murdy 2001:3595 [listed for western central Pacific, based on original description?]. Callogobius hasseltii (non Bleeker 1851).— Fowler 1949:133 [uncertainly synonymised from description in Koumans 1931; correctly assigning authorship to Bleeker]. Gobiopsis aporia Lachner & McKinney 1978:11–15, key, fig. 6, tabs. 1–6, pls. 1, 2b, 7a. Lachner & McKinney 1979:5 [comparison with G. atrata (Griffin)]; Akihito 1984:267, fig. 142, pl. 354D [brief description, distribution]; Böhlke 1984:104 [type list]; Ibarra & Stewart 1987:41 [type list]; Akihito et al. 1993a: 1042 [description, schematic drawing, key]; Akihito et al. 1993b: 1103, fig. 3 [schematic illustration of head barbels and papillae pattern]; Larson (in Randall & Lim) 2000:638 [listed for South China Sea]; Hutchins 2001:43 [listed for Western Australia]; Larson & Murdy 2001:3598 [listed for western central Pacific, based on original description]; Akihito et al. 2002:1249 [brief description, distribution, key, schematic illustration], fig. 37–6; Allen & Adrim 2003:59 [list]; Shibukawa et al. (in Kimura & Matsuura) 2003:185 [brief description and photo, Bitung Sulawesi]; Hoese & Larson 2006:1658 [list]; Shibukawa 2010:97 [general description of genus]; Allen & Erdmann 2012:976 [brief description and photo].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".