MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931224715 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5310421

Rhabdias ranae Walton 1929

2010· article· en· W6931224715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Case Reports and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonomy (biology)West virginiaFaunaSouth carolina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhabdias ranae Walton, 1929 Site of infection: lungs. Recruitment: vector. Prevalence, mean intensity and range: 25.9%, 2.28, 1-4. Specimens deposited: CNHE: 6947. Distribution: USA: Arizona (Goldberg et al., 1998); Louisina (USNPC); North Carolina (Brandt 1936); Ohio (Ashton & Rabalais 1978; Bursey & DeWolf 1998); Oklahoma (Morrison 1967); Texas (Harwood 1932; Hollis 1972; Mayberry et al. 2000); Virginia (Campbell 1968). Specimens in collections: USNPC: 84812. Remarks: In accordance with Kuzmin et al. (2003), this species is restricted to North American frogs; however, it is more common in hosts from northern United States and Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMedical Case Reports and StudiesFrench-language works237,207