MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931226830 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5927522

Paraeurybata Marshall 2019, new genus

2019· article· en· W6931226830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSpermathecaGenusDorsumWingBristle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paraeurybata new genus Type species: Calobata taeniata Macquart, 1851, here designated. Included species: Calobata taeniata. Diagnosis: Eurybatinae with a darkly infuscated wing crossed by narrow clear discal band. Head chaetotaxy complete, with large and equal postocellar, inner and outer vertical and upper and lower fronto-orbital setae (Fig. 1F). Pleuron with a prominent black-margined white longitudinal band. Hypandrium narrow, looped anteriorly; distiphallus with very short basal part, an indistinct phallic bulb and longitudinally divided distal part; ejaculatory duct strikingly thick. Description: (abdominal characters only; see also the full redescription of external head and abdominal features of “ Cothornobata taeniata ” in Barraclough 1992): Female abdomen: Pleural membrane of segments 2–5 with dorsal brown patch contiguous with tergite, otherwise white (Figs 1 A-B). Oviscape orange. Spermathecal ducts with long common stem arising from tapered bursa copulatrix and dividing apically into slender, extremely long ducts (Fig. 2D); ducts uniform except for sclerotized stem at base of each spermatheca; spermathecae acorn-shaped, small. Male abdomen: Pleuron as in female, but with brown areas more extensive, occurring on segments 1–6 (Fig. 1E). Sternite 5 (genital fork) bulbous, with 2 shallowly separated inflated, rounded lobes (apices collapsed on all available dried specimens) (Fig. 2B); inner surfaces with only small setulae. Sternite 6 narrow, but deeply V-shaped (Fig. 2C). Pregonite large and prominent, basally with a narrow loop-like connection to hypandrium and apically bilobed with lower lobe longer and tapered, with numerous short stout setae (Fig. 2A,E); postgonite much smaller, with rounded preapical ventral lobe. Phallapodeme sinuate (with a distinct kink) anteriorly. Basiphallus elongate and slender, extending beyond ejaculatory duct; basal part of distiphallus very short and bulbous, ending in indistinct phallic bulb; distiphallus beyond phallic bulb divided into 2 lateral strips that taper to whip-like apex after passing through narrow, loop-like hypandrium; posterior arms of hypandrium articulating with very long and slender anteroventral epandrial corner ventrally, and continuous with phallic guide (phallic plate) dorsally (Fig. 2A). Ejaculatory apodeme enormous, filling most of abdomen (Fig. 2A). Ejaculatory duct unusually broad. Surstylus large, bulbous, long setose and apically membranous ventrally, narrow at base with sclerotized inner basal margin continuous with subepandrial sclerite. Cercus simple, long setose. Comments: Specimens of P. taeniata in the Natural History Museum, London were labelled as “ Trepidaroides?” by Verbeke in 1963, who first recognized the affinity of this species to the Eurybatinae. McAlpine (1975) suggested that it belonged in the otherwise Australian-Oriental genus Cothornobata and Barraclough (1992) formally transferred it to Cothornobata. McAlpine (1998) characterized Cothornobata as a “… diverse and widely distributed genus, which is poorly studied morphologically and may not be monophyletic”. Li et al. (2015) concurred that Cothornobata as a whole is weakly supported and revised a northern Oriental clade, including the type species of the genus, as Cothornobata s.s. That clade, diagnosed by an elongate genital fork with relatively strong and hirsute tubercles on inner surface, a distiphallus with trifurcate terminal filaments and a broad, plate-like hypandrium, has since held up to scrutiny with both morphological and molecular characters, but the non-Oriental “ Cothornobata ” fall into two widely separated lineages of which neither belongs in Cothornobata. One of these lineages includes only P. taeniata, the only Afrotropical eurybatine. New collections from Mauritius have allowed reconsideration of the generic status of P. taeniata and the relative status of the Mauritian and Réunion populations. The new specimens differ in colour from Réunion specimens, especially in the dark mid femur with a distinct preapical yellow ring. This initially suggested that two species were involved, but sequencing of newly collected specimens from both Réunion and Mauritius suggests that the different populations are very close and that they are appropriately treated under the same species name. More significantly, the new sequence data allowed inclusion of Paraeurybata taeniata in a dataset of several hundred micropezids sequenced for CO1 (Marshall, unpublished) and a dataset of nine genera of Eurybatinae sequenced for multiple genes (16s, 28s, CAD, COI and EF-1α; Nur Md Yusof unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Guelph). None of the molecular data suggested that Paraeurybata was either within or closely related to Cothornobata, instead indicating that the sister group is either (Cothornobata s.s. + Eurybata) or just Eurybata. New morphological data (previously unstudied details of the male terminalia) also indicate that P. taeniata is not closely related to Cothornobata and support the decision to treat it as generically distinct from other eurybatines. The slender, looped hypandrium, the split and elongate distiphallus with neither a distinct phallic bulb nor distal filaments, the thick ejaculatory duct and the short and inflated genital fork render this species markedly different from both Cothornobata and Eurybata. The new specimens of Paraeurybata taeniata used for this work are important not only for allowing reconsideration of the generic status of the species and for expediting the careful comparison of Réunion and Mauritian populations, but also because they came with the first information on the biology of the species. It was photographed ovipositing in large, damp, shaded mossy logs. This is significant because it provides a possible explanation for the apparent rarity of the species and its apparent restriction to a few protected patches of forest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207