MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931244312 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5997716

Calycomyza promissa Frick

2018· article· en· W6931244312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx parteEx vivoEx situ conservationBin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calycomyza promissa (Frick) (Figs. 20, 117) Material examined. COLORADO: Larimer Co., Estes Park, 1.ix.2015, em. by 10.ix.2015, N. D. Charney, ex Symphyotrichum ascendens, #CSE2041, CNC654334 (1♂); Park Co., High Creek Fen, off of Rte. 185, 13.vii.2015, em. 25.vii.2015, C.S. Eiseman, ex Symphyotrichum, #CSE1828, CNC564673 (1♂); MASSACHUSETTS: Berkshire Co., Stockbridge, Agawam Lake, 14.viii.2017, em. 20.viii.2017, C.S. Eiseman, ex Symphyotrichum puniceum, #CSE4152, CNC939711 (1♀); Franklin Co., Northfield, 276 Old Wendell Rd., 4.viii.2017, em. 10.viii.2017, C.S. Eiseman, ex Symphyotrichum lateriflorum, #CSE4101, CNC939663 (1♂); NORTH CAROLINA: Durham Co., Durham, 20.v.2015, em. by 25.v.2015, T.S. Feldman, ex Symphyotrichum, #CSE1581, CNC564611, CNC564612 (1♂ 1♀); Scotland Co., Laurinburg, St. Andrews University, 15.v.2015, em. v.2015, T.S. Feldman, ex Symphyotrichum, #CSE1563, CNC564633 (1♂); 17.viii.2015, em. 18.viii.2015, T.S. Feldman, ex Symphyotrichum pilosum, #CSE2122, CNC564666 (1♀); 15.ix.2015, em. 24–28.ix.2015, T.S. Feldman, ex Symphyotrichum pilosum, #CSE2098, CNC653942, CNC653943 (2♂); x.2015, em. by xi.2015, T.S. Feldman, ex Symphyotrichum, #CSE2160, CNC653937 (1♀); 11.v.2016, em. 18.v.2016, T.S. Feldman, ex Symphyotrichum pilosum, #CSE2469, CNC653957 (1♀); OKLAHOMA: Payne Co., Mehan, 36.014339° N, 96.996744° W, 23.iii.2016, em. 2.iv.2016, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum praealtum, #CSE2651, CNC634798, CNC634799 (1♂ 1♀); 23.iii.2016, em. by iv.2016, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum drummondii, #CSE2657, CNC653987 (1♂); 24.iii.2016, em. 30.iii.2016, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum oolentangiense, #CSE2659, CNC653995 (1♀); 6.vi.2016, em. by 17.vi.2016, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum ericoides, #CSE2596, CNC634974, CNC634975 (2♂); 6.iii.2017, em. 17.iii.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum drummondii, #CSE3744, CNC939908 (1♀); 19.iii.2017, em. 29–31.iii.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum drummondii, #CSE3746, CNC939909, CNC9399 10 (2♂); 24.iii.2017, em. 3.iv.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Symphyotrichum ericoides, #CSE3731, CNC939890 (1♀). Tentatively identified material. FLORIDA: Lake Co., Alexander Springs, 26.iii.2013, em. 12–18.iv.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Ampelaster carolinianus, #CSE270, CNC384821–384824 (4♀). Hosts. Asteraceae: Symphyotrichum *ascendens (Lindl.) G.L. Nesom, S. chilense (Nees) G.L. Nesom (Frick 1956), S. * drummondii (Lindl.) G.L. Nesom, S. *ericoides (L.) G.L. Nesom, S. lateriflorum (L.) Á. Löve & D. Löve, S. *oolentangiense (Riddell) G.L. Nesom, S. * pilosum (Willd.) G.L. Nesom, S. * praealtum (Poir.) G.L. Nesom, S. * puniceum (L.) Á. Löve & D. Löve. Records of unspecified “ Aster ” spp. from Ontario (Spencer 1969) likely also represent Symphyotrichum spp.; we have found no mines resembling those of Calycomyza promissa on other asters, with the exception of Ampelaster carolinianus (Walter) G.L. Nesom, which is restricted to the southeastern USA. The mines and puparia on Ampelaster are entirely consistent with C. promissa, as are the females reared from this host, but males are needed to confirm their identity. Leaf mine. (Fig. 117) Initially linear; upon reaching the midrib it becomes a large, white blotch centered on the midrib that soon obliterates the linear portion. Frass is centrally deposited on the floor of the mine below the midrib in pellets and streaks coalescing to form a black mass. An emergence slit is cut at the edge of the mine (Frick 1956). The mine is generally circular but is irregular at the edges (Spencer 1969). Some of the mines we examined matched this description, but others were largely or entirely to one side of the midrib, with the frass deposited in a large central mass. In some mines the two epidermises were well separated, producing a blisterlike buckling of the leaf, and there were frequently irregular patches of green, uneaten parenchyma attached to the upper epidermis. The largest (and sometimes only) green area was always in the center of the mine, partially concealing the frass deposit. The initial linear portion was likewise green and interparenchymal, sometimes beginning as a white line on the lower surface. Puparium. (Fig. 20) Brown; formed within the mine, “upon a slender pile of frass of about one-half the puparial length” (Frick 1956). In examples we examined, the frass pile ranged from less than one fifth to one half the puparial length, but always formed a narrow pedestal that held the puparium above the floor of the mine. Larvae are normally solitary, but one mine contained two puparia. Distribution. USA: CA, *CO, FL (leaf mines and females only), LA, *MA, NY, *NC, *OK; Canada: MB, ON.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→