MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931245623 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6097169

Apanteles corvinus Reinhard 1880

2015· article· en· W6931245623 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalusApantelesPyrus communisOrchardInstar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apanteles corvinus Reinhard, 1880 Distribution in Iran. Ilam (Ghahari et al. 2011d), West Azarbaijan (Žikić et al. 2014). Distribution outside Iran. Austria (Shenefelt 1972), Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Sweden, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, UK, Uzbekistan (Yu et al. 2012), Switzerland (Shenefelt 1972). Host records. Hedya nubiferana, Coleophora ibipenella, C. serratella, Lyonetia clerkella and Paraswammerdamia lutarea (Nixon 1973). This species was introduced to Canada to control the birch casebearer moth Coleophora serratella (Raske 1978). It was also reported from Anthonomus pomorum (Fulmek 1968); Bucculatrix bechsteiniella on Pyrus communis; B. crataegi on Pyrus communis (Balevski and Tomov 1997); Leucoptera malifolliella on Malus domestica (Papp 1984) and on M. sylvestri (Balevski and Tomov 1998); Lyonetia clerkella on Prunus persica (Togashi 1981) and on Sorbus aucuparia (Vidal 1993); L. prunifoliella on Malus sylvestri (Balevski and Tomov 1997); Phyllonorycter oxyacanthae on Crataegus monogyna (Shaw and Askew 1976). Also, Yu et al. (2012) recorded from Phyllonorycter leucographella as host species. In Iran it has been reported from Leucoptera malifolliela on Malus domestica (Žikić et al. 2014).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207