Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Anicla forbesi (Franclemont) (Fig. 1) Forewing length 16.0–19.0 mm. Anicla forbesi can be confused with A. illapsa (Walker), but A. forbesi has a much larger proportion of the prothorax black than does A. illapsa. Forewing ground color is pale gray to reddish brown. The transverse lines on the forewing are represented by dark spots along the costa and can be faint in some specimens. Hindwing is white in male and slightly darker in female. Flight period: MidJune to early August. Collected localities: This species is not recorded from the Park, but it is likely to occur there. General distribution: Distributed from Nova Scotia to western Ontario and south to northern Ohio and Pennsylvania, along the Appalachian Mountains to southwest Virginia, and west to northern Michigan, central Wisconsin, and northern Minnesota (Lafontaine 2004). Larval hosts: Reared on timothy (Phleum pratense L., Poaceae) and probably feeds on a variety of other grasses (Lafontaine 2004).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".