Indoquedius baliyo Smetana 1988, syn. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoquedius baliyo Smetana, 1988 syn. nov. Material examined Paratype NEPAL – Bagmati Province • ♀; “Nepal (Prov. Bagmati), Malemchi; 2800 m; 17.IV.81; Löbl and Smetana / Paratype Indoquedius baliyo A. Smetana 1986 [yellow printed label] / PARATYPE CNC No. 20724 [yellow printed label] / CNC 978889 [identifier]”; CNC. Non-type material MYANMAR – Kachin State • 1 ♂; Three River Junction; 26°23′12.6″ N, 98°39′36.3″ E; 3 Oct. 2010; M. Langer, S. Naumann and S. Loffler leg.; under wood/stones; ASC. NEPAL • 1 ♂; Manaslu Mts, E slope of Ngadi Khola valley; 28°22′ N, 84°29′ E; 2000–2300 m; 14–16 May 2005; J. Schmidt leg.; CNC • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; ASC. Redescription Apart from Scheerpeltz (1965), the species has been described and diagnosed by Smetana (1988, 2017a) under the name I. baliyo. A dorsal habitus of the holotype of I. micantiventris is given in Fig. 1B. Distribution Nepal, India (West Bengal), Myanmar (Kachin), and China (Tibet / Xizang, Yunnan, Sichuan) (Smetana 2017a). Remarks The type series of Indoquedius micantiventris includes one male and one female. The male was dissected to reveal an aedeagus identical to the common, widespread species I. baliyo. Therefore I. baliyo syn. nov., becomes a junior synonym of I. micantiventris. Both specimens of the type series of I. micantiventris have slightly darkened antennomeres 4–11 (especially 4–5) compared to all other specimens of I. baliyo seen. However, no other differences were observed and the darkening is likely an artefact of preservation. The recently collected, non-type specimen examined from Myanmar (~ 120 km northeast of Kambaiti) has entirely normal coloration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".