Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tetracis fuscata (Hulst) (Figs. 27–29, 91, 106, 122, 137) Synaxis fuscata Hulst, 1898. Descriptions of new genera and species of the Geometrina of North America. Canadian Entomologist 30(8): 217. Holotype ♂, Glenwood Springs [Garfield Co.], Colorado [AMNH]. Note: Hulst, 1898, misspelled the locality as “Glenmore Springs.” Diagnosis: The angulate black DFW PM line, well-defined brown-black AM line, and lack of bipectinate antennae in males separate fuscata from its congeners formosa and gray forms of hirsutaria. Description: Adults (Figs. 27–29): FWL: 19–23 mm. Antenna light brown and serrate in male; in female nearly filiform, densely setose ventrally. Palpi slender, porrect, about 1.5x eye width, banded brown and fuscous. Head, thorax, abdomen, legs grayish-brown (Hulst’s “dirty fuscous”); abdomen speckled with dark scales. Wings: Grayish brown, well-peppered with dark scales. DFW with brown-black AM and PM lines; PM line angled basad at M3; MB only slightly darker than rest of wing; small discal spot present. DHW with poorly developed and incomplete dark median line; discal spot absent. Ventrally paler with dorsal markings lightly repeated. Female slightly larger and paler than male. Male genitalia (Figs. 91, 106): Uncus broad, slightly decurved, tapering to bluntly pointed tip. Dorso-caudal margin of gnathos concave with a robust upcurved spine at either side. Stubby robust furca from middle of anellus tapers to rounded apex, slightly enlarged before apex. Valve moderately broad with even margins, tapering to narrow rounded apex with a small triangular apical projection at the dorsal margin. Aedeagus with ring of spinules at posterior end at base of vesica; everted vesica with patch of sclerotized nodules on dome. Female genitalia (Fig. 122): A/P = 0.44. Long unsclerotized tubular ductus bursae (ca. 2x length of corpus bursae). Corpus bursae ovoid with small oval dentate signum located about 2/3 length of bursae above fundus. Material examined: 33 specimens with 3 dissections. Biology: Unknown. The timing of the adult flight in late August into September varies annually depending upon climatic conditions and flight ceases with the onset of the first hard mountain frost. Distribution (Fig. 137): UNITED STATES: COLORADO. Garfield, Larimer. WYOMING. Albany (Snowy Range Mts., Sherman Hills at southern end of Laramie Range) 7600–8200’ (2320–2500m).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".