Bibliographic record
Abstract
Platysmittia bilyji Saether Figs 31A–D Diagnosis. Labrum as in Fig. 31A; SI seta serrated bifid; premandible with 2 apical teeth; antenna (Fig. 31B) apparently 6-segmented, last one difficult to discern, 3 rd segment. reduced, about half as long as 4 th, blade slightly longer than flagellum, AR 1.0 (see Notes); mandible (Fig. 31C) with 3 inner teeth; mentum (Fig. 31D) with two median teeth and 5 laterals, the last two are paired; VM plates arched posterolaterally; setae submenti located near base of mentum; upper anal tubules elongate conical directed posteriorly, lower tubules narrower, curled ventrally. Notes. Generally agrees with description given by Jacobsen (1998), except 6 th hair-like antennal segment could not be discerned. Antennal ratio is based on 5-segmented antenna. Ecology and habitat. Larvae have been recorded in small intermittent streams within deciduous forests on leafy detritus and are mainly facultative collector-gatherers (Jacobsen 1998). In study streams larvae were abundant in areas with leaf packs. Sampling sites. Little White River, Killarney, Arrowhead and Algonquin Provincial Parks and Muskoka District. Nearctic distribution. Canada: Manitoba, first Ontario record. USA: Maryland, Pennsylvania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".