Atheta (Metadimetrota) savardae Klimaszewski & Majka 2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atheta (Metadimetrota) savardae Klimaszewski & Majka, 2007 Fig 45, Map 45 New Records. CANADA, New Brunswick, Sunbury Co., Acadia Research Forest, 45.9816°N, 66.3374°W, 19–27.IX.2007 (1 ♁, RWC); Acadia Research Forest, 46.0188°N, 66.3765°W, 19–27.IX.2007 (1 ♁, 1 ♀, AFC). Restigouche Co., Mount Carleton Provincial Park, Mount Sagamook, 2000 ft. elev., 47.1112°N, 66.8599°W, 2.IX.2006 (1 ♁, RWC). Sunbury Co., York Co. Charters Settlement, 45.8286°N, 66.7365°W, 5.X.2005 (1 ♁, RWC). Bionomic Notes. In New Brunswick, some adults of A. savardae were collected from decaying mushrooms in a mixed forest and a mature red spruce and eastern white cedar forest. Others were collected in pitfall traps in a mature red spruce and red ma- Map 45. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Atheta savardae. 46 47 48 Figures 43–48. 43 Atheta novaescotiae 44 A. prudhoensis 45 A. savardae 46 Dalotia coriaria 47 Dinaraea angustula 48 Dochmonota rudiventris [43, 44, 48, apical part of abdomen removed]. Scale = 1 mm ple forest and an 8.5-year-old regenerating mixed forest. In Nova Scotia, this species was collected from pitfall traps in a variety of deciduous and coniferous forest types (Klimaszewski and Majka 2007). Th is species was collected in September and October. Collection method: sifting, pitfall traps. Distribution in Canada and Alaska. QC, NB, NS (Klimaszewski and Majka 2007; Gouix and Klimaszewski 2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".