MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931274613 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4558813

Okanagrion beardi Archibald & Cannings & Erickson & Bybee & Mathewes 2021, new species

2021· article· en· W6931274613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParatypeMargin (machine learning)WingHolotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Okanagrion beardi Archibald & Cannings, new species Figs. 21–22. Diagnosis. Wings separated from those of all other Okanagrion species but O. dorrellae by MP, CuA distinctly divergent near margin [others: MP-CuA space remaining narrow; O. dorrellae: widening, but less distinctly as CuA zigzagged distally (O. angustum, not known)]; from all others except O. angustum by IR2 originating on RP1-2 [others: between RP1-2, RP3-4]; from O. angustum by Ax1 to nodus shorter, 6.5 mm (holotype; paratype 1: almost 6 mm, smaller wing, but proportions match holotype) [O. angustum: 7.5 mm]; from O. dorrellae by MP linear to margin [O. dorrellae: zigzagged near margin]; from O. liquetoalatum, O. dorrellae by wing shape: length (arculus to apex) / maximum width 3.1 [O. liquetoalatum: 2.6; O. dorrellae 3.7; others similar to O. beardi (O. lochmum, O. worleyae, O. angustum not comparable by preservation)]. Further separated by colouration (sex unknown): proximal approx. 2/5 hyaline, dark apical to this except narrow lighter fascia just distal to mid-way between nodus, pterostigma, extending from anterior margin to close to posterior margin; size and extent of light fascia differs from: O. hobani about twice or more as wide, extending to or almost to posterior margin; O. angustum apparently similar to O. hobani as preserved; O. threadgillae notably narrower, extending to mid-wing; O. dorrellae similar width, probably extending to mid-wing (but damage in this region); O. lochmum, similar to O. beardi; O. liquetoalatum: hyaline throughout; O. worleyae: lightly infuscate throughout known wing. Type material. Holotype: F-791 (part only) (Fig. 21): One complete wing and portions of two or three others; possibly part of one eye; part of damaged thorax preserved in lateral aspect; at least two pieces of abdomen present; collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, collector and date unknown; housed in the Thompson Rivers University collections. Paratype 1: RBCM P1546 (Fig. 22): a head, thorax, bits of some legs, proximal-most portion of the abdomen, well-preserved forewing and proximal portion of a hind wing; coated with shellac; collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, vi.1998 by unknown grade 8 or 9 student, donated by Graham Beard; in the Royal British Columbia Museum collections. Description. Holotype, F-791, forewing. Almost complete, missing tiny portions of the apex and proximal to the nodus. Shape: oval distal to nodus, symmetrical from lateral mid-line; length: 31.5 mm, arculus to apex: about 27.7 mm, nodus to apex: about 22.7 mm, origin of RP2 to apex: 18.2 mm, arculus to base of pterostigma: 22.0 mm, nodus to base of pterostigma: 16.8 mm, nodus at 29% wing length; width 8.3 mm. Colouration as in diagnosis. Pterostigma anterior, posterior margins oblique, 3.5 times longer than wide, subtends 6.5 cells, no oblique brace vein. 35 crossveins in postnodal space (complete), none hyperstigmal, crossveins in postsubnodal space not aligned. Maximum three cells wide distal to pterostigma in costal space (partially preserved). RA–RP1 space narrows near margin. RP1–IR1 space becomes two cells wide unknown number of cells from origin by preservation. IR1 origin eight cells distal to origin of RP2. IR1–RP2 space becomes two cells wide unknown number of cells origin by preservation. RP2 origin six cells distal to origin of IR2. IR2 origin very close to subnodus; close to, appears to arise from RP1-2. RP3-4 origin about 2/3 from arculus to nodus. Ax0 present. Arculus close to, immediately proximal to Ax2. No crossvein O. All main veins linear other than IR1 proximally. MP, CuA divergent at terminus on posterior margin. CuA–A space with maximum five cells wide. Paratype 1, RBCM P1546. Head (Fig. 10 M, Table 1): relatively well preserved in dorsal aspect but details obscure; labrum/clypeus area damaged. In dorsal view about 4.1 mm across eyes at widest part, with rear margin expanded somewhat postero-laterally; approximate length from anterior edge of antefrons to posterior of occiput 1.5 mm; at level of hind ocelli distance between eyes about 1.2 mm, single eye roughly 1.5 mm wide, 2.0 mm long. Thorax: lateral view; colouration dark, apparently with narrow pale stripe on mesopleural suture, any other patterns obscure; pieces of legs poorly preserved. Forewing: as in holotype except length: 31.6 mm, arculus to apex: 26.5 mm, nodus to apex: 21.7 mm, origin of RP2 to apex: 16.6 mm, arculus to base of pterostigma: 21.0 mm, nodus to base of pterostigma: 16.2 mm; width 7.7 mm; nodus at 25% wing length. Colouration mostly obscured by applied shellac, but as apparent is consistent with holotype. Pterostigma: 5.5 cells subtend, length 3.5 times width. Postnodal space with 36 crossveins (probably complete), distal-most one hyperstigmal. IR1 origin seven cells distal to origin of RP2; IR1– RP2 space becomes two cells wide six or seven cells (unclear by preservation) distal to origin by preservation. RP2 origin nine cells distal to origin of IR2. Ax0 not detected. CuA–A space unknown number of cells wide by preservation, but appears similarly wide as holotype. Abdomen: segments 1 and 2 preserved in lateral aspect; base of abdomen relatively slender; irregular ventral margin of segment 2 may indicate presence of secondary male genitalia but sex of specimen undetermined. Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronymic formed from the surname of Graham Beard, the donor of paratype 1, recognising his contribution. Range and age. McAbee, BC, Canada; mid-Ypresian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207