FIGURE 13 in Taxonomy, ecology and zoogeography of the Recent species of Rhamphostomella Lorenz, 1886 and Mixtoscutella n. gen. (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIGURE 13. Rhamphostomella cellata (O'Donoghue & O'Donoghue, 1923). Lectotype, NHMUK 1964.1.2.9 (Pacific coast of North America, presumably Vancouver Island, British Columbia). A. Colony margin with developing zooids. B. Distolateral view of marginal zooids, showing shape of primary orifice and dimpled surface of frontal shield. C. Zooidal orifice with suboral avicularium. D. Group of non-ovicellate zooids in young part of colony. E. Single non-ovicellate zooid in older part of colony. F. Zooids with damaged ooecia in older part of colony. G. Zooids in older part of colony. H. Distal part of zooid with partially broken ooecium, showing form of secondary orifice and suboral avicularium. I. Interior of frontal shield, showing umbo, areolae and ooecial communication slit (arrow). J. Basal surface of colony, showing hardly recognizable boundaries between zooids. K. Interior of frontal shield, showing ring scar and exterior wall microstructure of umbonuloid component. L. Lateral view of zooid, showing peristome, areolae and zooidal lateral wall with mural pore chambers. Scale bars: A, D, J, 500 μm; B, F, G, 250 μm; C, E, H, I, 100 μm; K, 50 μm; L, 200 μm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".