Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lycaenini 1118 * R h Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761) ssp. arethusa M Jul – M Aug M – – Dod, 1907 Arethusa Copper T: Dod (1907), Ford (1923), Ferris (1974) L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, PMAE, UASM 1119 * R Lycaena cupreus (Edwards, 1870) ssp. snowi M Jul – M Aug M – – (Edwards, [1881]) Lustrous Copper T: Scott (1981) L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), [Guppy and Shepard (2001)] C: CNC, NFRC, PMAE, UASM 1120 R Lycaena dione Scudder, 1868 Jul m b G Dione Copper L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, OLDS, UASM 1121 * S Lycaena editha (Mead, 1878) Jul – Aug M – – Edith’s Copper T: Koçak (1984) L: Anweiler and Schmidt (2003) C: UASM 1122 * R Lycaena rubidus (Behr, 1866) ssp. sirius (Edwards, 1871) Jul – – G Ruddy Copper T: Johnson and Balogh (1977) L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, PMAE, UASM 1123 * R Lycaena heteronea Boisduval, 1852 ssp. klotsi Field, 1936 Jul M – – Blue Copper T: Emmel and Pratt (1998) L: [Bird et al. (1995)], [Layberry et al. (1998)], [Guppy and Shepard (2001)] C: CNC, PMAE, UASM 1124 R Lycaena hyllus (Cramer, 1775) Jul m B G Bronze Copper L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1125 R Lycaena dorcas Kirby, 1837 ssp. dorcas Kirby, 1837 L Jul – M Aug M B – Dorcas Copper L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1126 * R Lycaena castro (Reakirt, 1866) ssp. florus (Edwards, [1884]) M Jul – M Aug M – – Florus Copper T: Kondla and Guppy (2002), Scott et al. (2006) L: [Bird et al. (1995)], [Layberry et al. (1998)] C: CNC, PMAE, UASM 1127 R Lycaena helloides (Boisduval, 1852) May – Aug m b G Purplish Copper L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, NFRC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1127.1 * P Lycaena nivalis (Boisduval, 1869) Jul – M Aug M – – Lilac-bordered Copper 1128 * R Lycaena mariposa (Reakirt, 1866) Jul M B – Mariposa Copper L: Bird et al. (1995), Layberry et al. (1998), Guppy and Shepard (2001) C: CNC, NFRC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.081 | 0.055 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".