MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931282258 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5121097

The Latest Trend In David Suzuki CBD Gummies Hemp Oil Canada Reviews.

2021· other· en· W6931282258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)Health benefitsPillContext (archaeology)Human health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

David Suzuki CBD Gummies Hemp Oil Canada Reviews It is an exceptional product that claims to have no adverse effects on the body so, David Suzuki CBD Gummies Hemp Oil Canada Reviews are a widely accepted popular supplement that works better than a pill or any drug. It also has lots of positive benefits in the body of a user. It also helps in treating and preventing lots of health diseases as well.\n\nOfficial Website:- http://healthwebcart.com/david-suzuki-cbd-gummies-hemp-oil-canada-reviews/\n\nfacebook:- https://www.facebook.com/David-Suzuki-CBD-Gummies-Hemp-Oil-Canada-Reviews-102059625509843

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3450.361

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research→French-language works237,207→