MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931300279 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6317136

The Fifty-Fifty Man: Understanding Diaspora through Indo-Canadian Literature

2022· article· en· W6931300279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomelandDiasporaIdentity (music)MulticulturalismReading (process)DistancingHinduismTheme (computing)Feeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indo-Canadian Diasporic literatures deal with the displacement of identities and the cultural assimilation that occurs over generation and with re-discovering the ‘hyphenated-identities’ that forms a major part of a diaspora. The constant conflict between ‘homeland’ and the ‘host-land’ creates a feeling of displacement that becomes a central theme for diasporic literatures. Indo-Canadian diasporic people bond over their shared nostalgia of the homeland – they experience a sort of parallel existence with one foot in the homeland and the other in the host-land. Through the two prominent novels of Indo-Canadian diaspora – Anita Rau Badami’s Can You Hear The Nightbird Call? And Rohinton Mistry’s A Fine Balance we understand the diasporic identity and what it entails. We will study how the characters in both the novels are all effected by the socio-political and economic conditions of India during the 1975 Emergency and how it alters each character. Badami’s novel moves between the Sikhs living in India and Sikhs living in Canada and the plight of them, while Mistry deals with Hindu - Muslim conflicts. This paper focuses on how reading these Canadian literatures during a worldwide Covid-19 pandemic changes one’s understanding of diasporic literature, cultures and diasporic identities. In a covid-19 pandemic situation when many Indians living in Canada are horrified about the conditions in their homeland, their helplessness for not being able to visit, relying on virtual world/online modes of communication to keep themselves up to date on the conditions in their homeland. Reading Canadian literatures with historical contexts of crises, mass deaths, economic and sociological downfall, political crisis etc., at a time when we ourselves are undergoing or rather surviving through a worldwide pandemic with countless deaths, economic downfall etc., shapes or alters the approach towards diasporic literatures giving us a better understanding of Canadian literatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0510.035
Scholarly communication0.0170.006
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→