Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hipposideros armiger Hodgson, 1835 Great roundleaf bat Rhinolophus armiger Hodgson, 1835: 699; Nepal. Distribution N India, Nepal, Myanmar, S and SE China, Vietnam, Lao PDR, Cambodia, Thailand, Malay Peninsula, Taiwan. Distribution in Lao PDR (Fig. 39): Attapu Province: Ban Paam; Houay Pha Camp, Xe Kaman, Dong Ampham NBCA (IEX/ROM/SMF collections); Bolikhamxai Province: limestone near Lak Sao (Ban Lak-20) (ROM/SMF collections); Tak Leuk (Tad Leuk), Phou Khaokhoay NBCA (EBD/ ROM collections); Champasak Province: Nong Luang Village (Ban Nonglouang) (HNHM collection); Dong Hua Sao NBCA (SMF collection); Houaphan Province: Tham Ajan (Tham Achan); Tham Thia Thong (Tham Thiathong) (HI collection); Ban Chak, Nam Et NBCA (EBD/ROM collection); Khammouan Province: Tam En (Tham En); Tam Kok Der Som (Tham Kokdesom); Tam Nam (II) (Tham Nam (II)); Tam Nong Seng (Tham Nongseng); Tam Pra (I) (Tham Pa (I)); Tam Quaie (Tham Khoay) (Robinson and Webber, 2000); Tham Khoun Don (Tham Khoundon); Tham Lom; Tham Xe Bangfai (Tham Xebangfai) (HI collection); Ban Vang Manua (Ban Vangma-Nua), Hin Namno NBCA (ROM collection); Ban Khankeo, Khammouan Limestone NBCA (ROM/SMF collection); Nakai Plateau; Nam Pakkatan, Nakai Plateau (SMF collection); Louangnamtha Province: Oung Hanthiar (Oung Hanthian); Oung Pra Ngiene (Oung Pangien); Tham Banthung; Tham Kathing; Tham Nampob; Tham Nam Rok (Tham Namlok); Tham Pasat Ban Namai; Tham Pasat-thia 3; Tham Roj Ru (Tham Lochu); Tham Pasat-thia 1; Tham Pasatthia 2 (HI collection); New Ban Namsing (Ban Namsing-mai) (IEX collection); Ban Phoulan (CMF field record); Louangphabang Province: Nam Khan (EBD collection); Tham Dout, Phou Khoun (HI collection); Oudomxai Province: Tham Na Thong (Tham Nathong), Namor (Namo) District (HI collection); Xiangkhouang Province: Tranninh (Bourret, 1942).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".