Bibliographic record
Abstract
M. muesebecki Loan Figures 85–88 Microctonus muesebecki Loan, 1967, p 234. Microctonus barri Loan, 1969, p 413. n. syn. Distribution: Southern Canada, eastern and central U.S., and Mexico. Specimens examined: Four hundred and three from 155 collection events; questionable female identifications: 53 from 37 collection events. Flight period: Approximately 80% (of collection events) from May through August. Remarks: The intraspecific variation for this species is rather high. Indeed, several specimens have been identified as M. mellinus, M. eleodis, and M. carabivorus by a number of taxonomists. The type material of M. barri have pronounced carinae in the depression of the ventral mesosoma in contrast to most specimens of M. muesebecki which have an absence or less pronounced carinae in the depression. Similarly, measurements of M. barri are in the range of M. muesebecki but are larger than average.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".