MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931321244 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5595764

Geographic homogenization but little net change in the local richness of Canadian butterflies

2022· other· en· W6931321244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecies richnessGeneralist and specialist speciesBiodiversitySpecies diversityBeta diversityRange (aeronautics)ButterflyGlobal biodiversityTaxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Recent studies have found that local-scale plots measured through time exhibit marked variation in the change in species richness. However, the overall effect often reveals no net change. Most studies thus far have been agnostic about the identities of the species lost/gained, as well as the processes that may lead to these changes. Generalist traits may be crucial in allowing species to colonize new plots or remain resilient in situ, whereas environmental filtering may remove specialists. We test whether plots are changing in species richness, whether they are becoming more similar (i.e. becoming homogenized) through time, as well as whether several generalist traits can predict gains or losses from local plots. Location: Canada Time period: 1945-2015 Major taxa studied: 265 species of butterflies Methods: We measured i. species richness change and ii. pairwise beta diversity across 96 well-sampled 10x10 km plots across Canada between two time periods: 1945-1975 and 1985-2015. We looked at the effects of wingspan, mobility, diet breadth and range size on the number of grid cells each species gained and lost between time periods. Results: We observed a slight increase in plot-level species richness, and that these communities are becoming homogenized through time. We note that most butterfly species in Canada have large North American ranges, but the widest-ranged species are better able to colonize new plots than narrower-ranged species, but also experience higher frequencies of local extinctions. In sum, the median range size of species within a plot increased through time. Main conclusions: We highlight that, even when local species richness exhibits very little change, other potentially important biodiversity changes, such as geographic homogenization due to the colonization dynamics of already widely distributed species, can occur. Such patterns can reconcile observed global losses of species with the simultaneous lack of change in local diversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it