MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931326468 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5156702

Bromus pinetorum Swallen 1943

2014· article· en· W6931326468 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicForecasting Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLemma (botany)PanicleCaryopsisStamenBromus inermis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

17. Bromus pinetorum Swallen (1943: 77). Fig. 56. Bromopsis pinetorum (Swallen) Holub (1973: 168). Type:— MÉXICO. Coahuila: Sierra del Pino: vicinity of La Noria, 20–26 August 1940, I.M. Johnston & C.H. Mueller 497 (holotype US-2209362!, isotypes US-1981050! fragm., GH-00023262!). Plants perennial, not rhizomatous. Culms 80–120 cm tall, 2.5–3 mm wide at base, erect or ascending; nodes 3–7, moderately to densely pubescescent. Leaf sheaths densely pubescent, hairs up to 1.5 mm long; auricles absent; ligules 1.5–4 mm long, lacerate, glabrous, sometimes with a few hairs along the margins; blades 14.5–32 cm × 5–10 mm, flat, firm, abaxial and adaxial surfaces sparsely to densely pubescent, sometimes glabrous, margins serrulate. Panicles 16.5–22 cm long, open, nodding, branches erect to ascending, stiff, scabrous, 1–2(–3) spikelets per branch, lower branches longer than spikelets, upper branches shorter or longer than spikelets. Spikelets 2.5–3 cm long, 7–9-flowered, elliptic to lanceolate, terete to morderately laterally compressed; glumes pubescent, hairs up to 0.5 mm long, green to purplish green, margins narrowly hyaline, midnerves glabrous proximally, scabrous to pubescent distally; lower glumes 7.5–9 mm long, narrowly lanceolate, 1-nerved, apices acute; upper glumes 9.5–11 mm long, obovate-lanceolate, 3-nerved, apices mucronate, mucros up to 1.5 mm long; lemmas 10–11 mm long, elliptic to lanceolate, rounded over the backs, apices obtuse to truncate, 7-nerved, pubescent across the backs and margins, hairs up to 0.5 mm long; awns (6–) 6.5–8 mm long, inserted up to 0.5 mm below lemma apex, straight; paleas shorter than the lemmas, backs pubescent, keels ciliate, cilia 0.1–0.2 mm long; anthers (3–) 3.5–4 mm long; caryopses 8.5−9.5 mm long, light brown. 2 n = unknown. Distribution:—Native. Endemic to Coahuila, where it is known only from Sierra de la Madera and Sierra del Pino in western Coahuila (Fig. 57). Ecology: —Pine-oak forests in rocky arroyos derived from calcareous parent materials; associated with Juniperus deppeana, Quercus gravesii Sudworth (1927: 86), Q. intricata Trel. in Standley (1922: 185), Pinus arizonica, Prunus serotina, Arbutus xalapensis and Fallugia paradoxa. Elevation: 1615–1980 m. Common Names: —Unknown. Comments: — Bromus pinetorum is a poorly understood taxon, known from only a few collections. Johnston (1943) considered the material here included in B. pinetorum to be a hairy robust form of B. anomalus. Described by Swallen (1943), the species was recognized by Wagnon (1952), but most other authors have included B. pinetorum in B. lanatipes (Soderstrom & Beaman 1968, Beetle 1977, Espejo-Serna et al. 2000, Pavlick et al. 2003). Beetle (1987) did not mention the taxon. We experienced difficulty placing plants included here into B. lanatipes, from which it differs by its longer awns [(6–) 6.5–8 mm vs. 2–6.5 mm], longer lemmas [10–11 mm vs. 8–10 mm], longer glumes [lower glumes 7.5–9 mm vs. 4–6 mm, upper glumes 9.5–11 mm vs. 6.5–8 mm], pubescent leaf sheaths [vs. lanate leaf sheaths], stiffer inflorescence branches [vs. laxer inflorescence branches] and stiffer and generally wider leaf blades [5–10 mm wide vs. laxer and 4–7 mm wide]. Bromus pinetorum differs from B. richardsonii by its longer anthers [(3–) 3.5–4 mm vs. 1–2.6(–3.4) mm], longer awns [(6–) 6.5–8 mm vs. 3.1–6.5 mm], panicle branches that are stiff and erect to ascending [vs. lax and ascending to nodding] and stiff leaf blades [vs. lax]. The stiffly erect to nodding panicles of B.pinetorum are similar to those of B. pumpellianus Scribner (1888: 9), a widespread western North American species of sect. Bromopsis that does not occur in México. The known southernmost distribution of B. pumpellianus is in northern New Mexico (Pavlick & Anderton 2007). Bromus pinetorum differs from B. pumpellianus in lacking rhizomes [vs. rhizomatous], lemma apices obtuse to truncate [vs. subulate to acute], shorter anthers [(3–) 3.5–4 mm vs. 3.5–7 mm], and longer lemmatal awns [(6–) 6.5–8 mm vs. 1–4.5(–5) mm]. Pavlick & Anderton (2007) reported lemmatal awns up to 7.5 mm long in B. pumpellianus, whereas in other treatments the awns of this species are reported as 1.5–5 mm (Tzvelev 1976), 1–4.5(–5) mm (Saarela 2008), 2–3 mm (Allred 1993) and <3 mm (Weber & Wittmann 2001). The measurements in Pavlick & Anderton (2007) may have included specimens of B. riparius Rehmann (1872: 10), a closely-related Old World species (Saarela et al. 2007) used in North America as forage, which has awns (3–) 4–7.1 mm long (Saarela 2008). Peterson & Annable 10676 is placed here even though it has short-awns (2−3.5 mm long); in other respects it agrees with characteristics of B. pinetorum. Bromus pinetorum is unique in sect. Bromopsis in México in having firm leaf blades and stiff inflorescence branches. However, these characters are described only from a few herbarium specimens. This curious taxon should be studied more closely in the field. Specimens Examined:— MÉXICO. Coahuila: vicinity of La Noria, a broad valley in the calcareous Sierra del Pino, [28.23°N, 102.87°W], 28 August 1941, R.M. Stewart 1213 (GH); Sierra El Pino, 39.5 km Wof Rancho El Cimarron, 15 Sep 1991, P.M. Peterson & C.R. Annable 10676 (US); W Coahuila, Sierra de la Madera, vicinity of La Cueva in Corte Blanco fork of Charretera Canyon, 27.14°N, 102.53°W, 1615–1981 m, 11–15 September 1941, I.M. Johnston 8926 (GH, US-90887, US-1817802).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207