MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931342165 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6576289

Calliope: Generating Symbolic Multi-Track Music on the Web

2022· article· en· W6931342165 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIDISnippetNotationZoomTweakingSet (abstract data type)Musical notationWeb applicationPolyphony

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of computer-assisted composition (CAC) systems is a research activity that dates back to at least the works by IRCAM on OpenMusic. CAC is a field that is concerned with developing systems that are capable of automating partially or completely the process of music composition. There exists several compositional tasks a system can address (e.g. rhythm generation, harmonization, melody generation, etc). These tasks can be realized with machine learning (ML) algorithms given a conditioning or not on prior musical sequences. Many ML-based CAC systems have emerged from both academia and industry over the years. For the majority of them, the user continuously generate music by tweaking a set of parameters that influences the model’s generation. Building on top of Apollo, an interactive web environment that makes corpus-based music algorithms available for training and generation via a convenient graphical interface, Calliope is specialized for advanced MIDI manipulation in the browser and generative controllability of the Multi-Track Music Machine (MMM) model for batch generation of partial or complete multi-track compositions. The aim is to enable the ability for composers to effectively co-create with a generative system. Calliope is built in Node.js, the Web stack (HTML, CSS, Javascript) and MongoDB. It is made interoperable with the MMM pretrained model via the Python runtime. MMM offers both global-level deep learning parameters (e.g. temperature) and track-level music-based constraint parameters: note density, polyphony range and note duration range. Bar selection can be used to refine the request for generation. It is also possible to delete or add MIDI tracks to an existing MIDI file in order to generate on a subset of the tracks or to generate a new track for a given composition. The composer makes use of all these varied controls to steer the generative behavior of the model and guide the composition process. Batch generation of musical outputs is implemented via the MMM’s Python interface which offers batch support natively. This ability means that the composer can rapidly explore alternatives, including generating from a previously generated output, for a given set of control parameters. We have tested batch requests of 5, up to 1000 generated music excerpts at a time, which take from 3 seconds to 10 minutes on an average computer depending on the note density of the music input. This process drives an interactive loop of continuous music generation and playback listening for the composer to navigate the creative process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207