MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931342261 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3951734

tardis-sn/tardis: TARDIS v3.0.dev3484

2020· other· en· W6931342261 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCode (set theory)DocumentationSource codeSequence (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes: 74ae0fe8f14fc63b64997be0070067654ff3094a [MRG] Using Mamba in Pipelines (#1210) 56f6acd694035e412316b21f8d31e0c543d6c245 Add new Contribution guidelines (#1237) e2ea846ef69180c7d6ae6b3fac8e5f1d8073faaf code of conduct symlink (#1238) 210f89ddbe7bb1d9bda20b2e8c3f2ee4ad337a25 TARDIS Code of Conduct (#1234) 2c682864b95616232b1f668545a9f92b89dc67ba Update of the Governance model (#1233) 6095cea1631daca33cae578cb8311b9cbf92001f Roadmap Documentation Page (#1231) cd35df9ba8106efcf8244bad711b1f95187369ae Update base.py (#1227) This list of changes was auto generated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6820.766

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207