MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931351321 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791024

Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) flavicornis Melsheimer

2009· article· en· W6931351321 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMorphological variations and asymmetry
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)AedeagusSetaSternumMapleAppendage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

25. Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) flavicornis Melsheimer Figs 24, 159–165; Map 21 Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) flavicornis Melsheimer, 1844: 31; Seevers 1951: 722; Moore and Legner 1975: 429; Campbell and Davies 1991: 106. Description. Body length 2.0– 2.7 mm, broadly subparallel; head piceous; pronotum light to dark reddish-brown; elytra flavo-testaceous or reddish-brown with some small darker spots laterally and in scutellar region; abdomen reddish-brown, apical portion often darker. Punctation: vertex of head with at least 10 moderately-sized coarse punctures on each side, pronotum with two median rows of coarse punctures and additional punctures scattered elsewhere, elytra with fine, sparse punctures. Microsculpture: reticulate throughout but weaker on elytra. Antennae as illustrated (Fig. 24). Pronotum 1.4 times as wide as long. MALE: tergite 8 with two small lateral teeth and usually with two minute median teeth (occasionally only one tooth present or the teeth reduced to small tuberosities), apical margin slightly emarginate medially (Fig. 161); sternite 8 rounded apically (Fig. 162). Median lobe of aedeagus with complex tubus, its apex Map 2Ι. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Gyrophaena flavicornis with subapical hook-like projection (Fig. 159), apical projection of internal sac elongate and truncate apically (Fig. 159). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 160). FEMALE. Tergite 8 truncate apically (Fig. 164); sternite 8 slightly produced apically (Fig. 165); spermatheca as illustrated (Fig. 163). Bionomics. Macrohabitat: Mixed forest, hardwood forest, rich Appalachian hardwood forest, red oak and red maple forest, 8.5-year-old regenerating mixed forest, mature red spruce and red maple forest. Microhabitat: on/in gilled mushrooms on forest floor, in gilled mushroom on stump, on Pleurotis species growing on a log, and in Porodaedalea piceina (Peck) Niemalä on dead standing beech tree. This species has also been found in decaying mushrooms, on white fungus on white birch. Collecting period: June, July, August, and September. Collecting method: sifting mushrooms, aspirating, and hand collecting. Distribution (Map 21). CANADA: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Quebec; UNITED STATES: District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMorphological variations and asymmetryFrench-language works237,207