Euaesthetus blanchardi Puthz 2014, nov.sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Euaesthetus blanchardi nov.sp. (Abb. 27, 64) T y p u s m a t e r i a l: Holotypus (): U.S.A.: MA: Tyngsborough, 21.I.1898 (Fall coll.). Paratypen: 1: Drac [ut], 25.XII.1885, Blanchard. CANADA: 1: NB: York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8430’N, 66.7278’W, regenerating mixed forest, dried vernal pond, in moss and grass, litter on moist clay, 10.IX.2009, R.P. Webster.- HT und 1 PT im MCZH, 1 PT in cWebster. B e s c h r e i b u n g: Rotbraun, mässig glänzend, Vorderkörper wenig fein, sehr dicht punktiert, Abdomen sehr fein, äusserst dicht skulptiert, matt; Beborstung dicht, anliegend. Fühler, Taster und Beine rötlichbraun. L ä n g e: 1,2-1,5mm (Vorderkörperlänge: 0,7-0,8mm). PM des HT: HW: 39; DE: 29; PW: 40; PL: 37; EW: 48; EL: 35; SL: 25. M ä n n c h e n: Vordersternite einfach. 8. Sternit (Abb. 64). 9. Sternit apikal zugespitzt Aedeoagus (Abb. 27). W e i b c h e n: Unbekannt. Pronotum in der Hinterhälfte nur mit wenig deutlichen Seitenfurchen, diese sind kurz und nur angedeutet. Elytren nicht irisierend. D i f f e r e n z i a l d i a g n o s e: Äusserlich ähnelt diese neue Art vor allem dem Eu. wickhami nov.sp., von dem sie sich aber durch anderen Umriss der Apikalpartie des Medianlobus unterscheidet. Auch dem Eu. dybasi PUTHZ ist die Art sehr ähnlich, lässt sich aber anhand des Aedoeagus sicher trennen. E t y m o l o g i e: Diese Art ist ihrem Sammler Frederick Blanchard (1843-1912) gewidmet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".