MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931386991 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4559807

Okanopteryx macabeensis Archibald & Cannings & Erickson & Bybee & Mathewes 2021, new species

2021· article· en· W6931386991 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParatypeFace (sociological concept)HolotypeGeological surveyApex (geometry)Type locality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Okanopteryx macabeensis Archibald & Cannings, new species Figs. 53–57. Diagnosis. Wings distinct from those of O. fraseri, O. jeppesenorum as in their diagnoses; further from O. fraseri by abdomen/body length as in its diagnosis. Material. Holotype: GSC 141100 (collector number SBA-2801) (Fig. 53), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, Geological Survey of Canada locality code V-016800, by SBA, 10.vii.2000, housed in the Geological Survey of Canada collections; paratype 1: GSC 141101 (Fig. 54, 55A, 55 C–55F), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, Geological Survey of Canada locality code V-016801 by Rod Bartlett, vii.1991, in the Geological Survey of Canada collections; paratype 2: F-790 (Fig. 56), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, date and collector unknown (this is the much less complete counterpart; the part, with the almost entire insect preserved, was last seen in the inaccessible private collection of a commercial fossil dealer), in the Thompson Rivers University collections; paratype 3: GSC 141102 (collector number SBA-5928) (Fig. 57), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, Geological Survey of Canada locality code V-016800, by SBA, date unknown, in the Geological Survey of Canada collections; paratype 4: RBCM 3087 (Fig. 53), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds by John Leahy, date unknown in the Royal British Columbia Museum collections. Description. Holotype, GSC 141100, wing (Fig. 53). Almost complete, missing petiole, small portion of the posterior margin in the apical quarter. Oval distal to nodus. Nodus to apex estimated 18.4 mm (presumed: small portion of apex missing), nodus to pterostigma 14.2 mm; width 6.5 mm wide. Hyaline except for broad, darkly infuscate fascia from level of nodus to about half distance to apex (similar to other Okanopteryx species). Pterostigma broad, 2.5 times longer than wide. Region of possible oblique brace vein missing. Crossveins in postnodal, postsubnodal spaces mostly aligned. Two cells wide distal to pterostigma in region of costal space preserved except one wide at pterostigma. RA–RP1 space one cells wide (apical-most portion not preserved). RP1–IR1 space goes to two cells wide seven cells distal to origin of IR1. IR1: origin two cells distal to origin of RP2; two cells wide close before level of pterostigma. RP2: origin 3.5 cells distal to origin of IR2; two cells wide same level as IR1–RP2 space; linear, straight to slight, even curve posteriorly near margin. IR2 origin at subnodus, mostly straight, linear except near margin slightly zigzag with slight, even curve posteriad. RP3-4: origin about half way between anterior-distal corner of quadrangle, nodus; straight, linear to slight, even curve posteriorly near margin. MA straight, linear, begins slight zigzag shortly beyond level of origin of IR1, increasingly so, but missing close to margin. MP linear, slightly curved from quadrangle, missing near terminus. CuA slightly zigzagged distal to level of origin of RP2; CuA–A space about six columns of three cells wide; otherwise two distal to level of nodus. Paratype 1, GSC 141101, male (Figs. 54, 55A, 55 C–55F). Complete body, total length 37.7 mm; abdomen preserved in ventral aspect, at least distal to segment 4; thorax and head in dorsal aspect; portions of four legs, portions of all four wings. Head (Fig. 10 L, Table 1). In dorsal view about 3.7 mm across eyes at widest point; approximate length from anterior edge of antefrons to posterior of occiput about 1.5 mm; at level of hind ocelli distance between medial margins of eyes about 1.0 mm, width of eye about 1.2 mm, length 1.8 mm. Thorax. Dorsum of prothorax oval, 2.1 mm wide, 1.1 mm long; pterothorax about 6.0 mm long. Legs. Lengths of leg segments unclear, not measured. Wings. Left fore(?)wing. Proximal portion to presumed (based on holotype) half distance between nodus, apex. Darkly infuscate from nodus to distal portion preserved, hyaline proximal to nodus. Maximum width 6.9 mm. Crossveins aligned in postnodal, postsubnodal spaces (portion preserved). RP1 –IR1 space goes to two cells wide three cells distal to origin of IR1. IR1: origin two cells distal to origin of RP2. RP2: origin three cells distal to origin of IR2. IR2 origin very close to subnodus; straight, linear. RP3-4: origin not preserved; linear, straight where reserved. MA linear, slightly curved from quadrangle to zigzag increasingly from about level of origin of IR1. MP linear, slightly curved from quadrangle. CuA with slight zigzag beyond level of nodus, increasing beyond level of origin of RP2, CuA–A space about 10 columns with 3 cells wide, the rest two distal to level of origin of PR 3-4. Left hind(?) wing. Same region preserved as left fore(?)wing, but more complete in antenodal region. Petiole partially preserved. Shape as for left fore(?)wing. Width 6.9 mm. Hyaline, infuscate in same regions, but infuscation notably lighter. Crossveins in postnodal, postsubnodal spaces aligned. RP1 –IR1 space goes to two cells wide four cells distal to origin of IR1. IR1: origin three cells distal to origin of RP2. RP2: origin four cells distal to origin of IR1; straight, linear. IR2 origin very close to subnodus; straight, linear. RP3-4: origin at level of Ax2, half way between anteriordistal corner of quadrangle, nodus, in middle third between arculus, nodus. MA slightly zigzagged from level of origin of IR1, increasingly so distal to it. MP linear, slightly curved from quadrangle through preserved portion near terminus. CuA linear from level of quadrangle until slight zigzag from nodus level increasingly so after level of origin of RP2; CuA–A space with about ten columns of three cells at widest, otherwise two from level of origin of RP3- 4. Right wings fragmentary, preserved portions do not disagree with left wings; presumed hind(?) wing with same lighter infuscation as left hind(?) wing. Presumed fore(?)wing colouration as in holotype. Abdomen approximately 20.0 mm long. Anal appendages: cerci 1.3 mm long, 0.4 mm wide, evenly curved medially, the rounded apices nearly touching; paraprocts about 0.8 mm long, 0.4 mm wide at base tapering to 0.2 mm at apex, extending about 0.7 the length of cerci; medial side straight, lateral side curved medially; apex slightly hooked medially, rounded. Paratype 2, F-790 (Fig. 55). Head; thorax, parts of five legs, both forewings missing the apical quarters, the proximal portions of both hind wings; the abdomen to part of segment 3; preserved in dorsal aspect. Head (Fig. 10 O, Table 1). Relatively well preserved; in dorsal view about 3.8 mm across eyes at widest point; approximate length from anterior edge of antefrons to posterior of occiput about 1.7 mm; at level of hind ocelli distance between medial margins of eyes about 1.1 mm, width of eye about 1.3 mm, length 2.2 mm. Thorax. Prothorax roughly oval, about 1.5 mm wide, 1.0 mm long; pterothorax slightly deformed, especially posterior part, about 5.9 mm long, 3.2 mm wide. Legs. Left profemur 3.0 mm long, tibia 3.8 mm (setae 0.6 mm long, their bases separated by about half their length), tarsus 1.5 mm. Right forewing. Petiolate. no accessory antenodal crossveins. Maximum width 6.5 mm. Proximal portion hyaline, darkly infuscate from level of nodus to near level where RP1 –IR1 space becomes two cells wide, hyaline in portion preserved distal to this. Crossveins in postnodal, postsubnodal spaces almost all aligned. RP1 space goes to two cells wide five cells distal to origin of IR1. IR1: origin three cells distal to origin of RP2. RP2: origin four cells distal to origin of IR2. IR2: origin at subnodus; linear, straight in portion preserved. RP3-4: origin about 2/3 from arculus to nodus; linear, straight in portion preserved. MA linear, slightly curved from quadrangle to about level of origin of IR1, increasingly zigzags distal to this. MP linear, slightly curved from quadrangle, small portion near terminus not preserved. CuA increasingly zigzagged from level of origin of RP3-4; CuA–A space about seven columns of three cells at widest, otherwise two beyond level of origin of RP3-4. Left forewing. Petiolate. no accessory antenodal crossveins in areas preserved. Width 6.6 mm. Proximal portion hyaline, darkly infuscate from level of nodus to near level where RP1 –IR1 space becomes two cells wide, hyaline in portion preserved distal to this. Crossveins in postnodal, postsubnodal spaces almost all aligned. RP1 –IR1 space becomes two cells wide four cells distal to origin of IR1. IR1: origin three cells distal to origin of RP2. RP2: origin 3.5 cells distal to origin of IR2. IR2: origin at subnodus; linear, straight in portion preserved. RP3-4: origin similar distance from nodus as right forewing; linear, straight in portion preserved. MA linear, slightly curved from quadrangle to about level of origin of IR1, zigzagged distal to this. MP linear, slightly curved from quadrangle, small portion near terminus not preserved. CuA increasingly zigzagged from level of origin of RP3-4; CuA–A space number of columns of three cells wide difficult to determine as preserved, two evident, likely more, otherwise two beyond level of origin of RP3-4. Right hind wing. Proximal part of wing from articulation to distal side of quadrangle present. Left hind wing. Only base of petiolate portion present. Abdomen mostly missing; only segments, 1, 2 and proximal part of 3 present. Paratype 3, GSC 141102, two wings (Fig. 57). Middle portions. Wing 1 (Fig 57B) missing posterior portion. Darkly infuscate consistent with the holotype. Crossveins in preserved portion of postnodal, postsubnodal spaces aligned. RP1 –IR1 space becomes two cells wide four cells distal to origin of IR1. IR1: origin three cells distal to that of RP2. RP2: origin not preserved. Preserved portions of IR1, RP2, IR2, RP3-4, MP linear, mostly rather straight. MA becoming, increasingly zigzagged distal to level of origin of IR1. MP linear, slightly curved. Wing 2 (Fig. 50C). As for wing 1, except: maximum wid

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207