MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931391559 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8290037

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) exiguum

2023· article· en· W6931391559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeMargin (machine learning)PeninsulaType (biology)Carboniferous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) exiguum (Smith, 1879) Figs 22A, 23A, 24A, 34A Halictus exiguus Smith, 1879: 37 (holotype, ♀, NHMUK 010265368). Dialictus exiguus – Moure & Hurd 1987: 100 (catalogue). Type material Holotype MEXICO – ♀; on/around Orizaba volcano; [19° N, 97.3° W]; “8.M.1856”; M. Salle leg.; NHMUK 010265368. Other material examined MEXICO – Quintana Roo • 1 ♀; 12 km NW of Reforma; [18.89° N, 88.65° W]; 14 Oct. 1986; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC SM0753053 • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; 14 Oct. 1986; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC SM0730146, SM0753052 • 1 ♀; Reforma; [18.81° N, 88.57° W]; 14 Oct. 1986; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC. Remarks Uncommon on the Yucatán Peninsula (four specimens examined in the region); more common in Veracruz. The very large head and rectangular, strongly toothed clypeus apical margin are unmistakable diagnostic characters for this species. We consider the identifications highly reliable despite the distance between Orizaba and Quintana Roo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it