MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931399983 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5944338

Netomocera nearctica Yshm Det. C. M. Yoshimoto 1977

2019· article· en· W6931399983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScutellumWingCrestSetaSulcusSimple eye in invertebrates

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Netomocera nearctica Yoshimoto, 1977 Figs 131–143 Netomocera nearctica Yoshimoto, 1977: 1044 (holotype (♀) in CNC, not examined). Diagnosis Both sexes Clypeal margin emarginate (Fig. 134). Upper face and vertex with eight large setae (Fig. 133). Occiput margin blunt (Fig. 133). Scutellum medially longitudinally striate and laterally reticulate, with elongate cells, frenal area striate-reticulate (Fig. 137). Propodeum (Fig. 138) without a well-defined V-shaped area basally, with small smooth areas among carinae; nucha large, with lateral margins parallel. Visible part of petiole very short, distinctly transverse, with more or less obliterate sculpture (Fig. 138). Female Head yellowish (Figs 132–133). Flagellum mainly brown (Fig. 135). Macropterous (Fig. 140) or brachypterous (Fig. 131); fore wing with two transverse brownish bands, one behind basal part of marginal vein and second behind stigma, occasionally with a third spot between second band and apical wing margin (Figs 139, 141). Head width equal to combined length of pedicel and flagellum. Antenna (Fig. 135) strongly clavate, fu7 width 1.7–1.9 × length; clava length 1.6–1.7× width. Mesosoma length 1.7–2.0 × height. Mesoscutum very shallowly reticulate (Fig. 137), width 2.5–2.9 × length. Mesepimeral sulcus inconspicuous (Fig. 136). Male Head brownish (Fig. 142). Funicle of uniform colour or sometimes fu1 lighter (Fig. 143). Fore wing usually with at least one brownish band behind basal part of marginal vein (Fig. 142); apical part of basal cell mainly bare, with at most some scattered setae (Fig. 142). Fu1 length 1.3–1.5 × width. Scutellum with at least a small shiny area with superficial sculpture on posterior third to half, usually including central part of frenal area, the latter at least laterally striate in large specimens (cf. Fig. 137). MV 4.0–4.2 × SV. Material examined CANADA • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; “ONT.: Chatterton, 13 mi N. Belleville. Meadow, 26.V.1976, Coll. C. D. Dondale ”; “ Netomocera nearctica Yosh., det Z. Bouček 1993”; BMNH • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; “Top B35. 14.VIII.1967 ”; BMNH • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; “Top E50 1.IX.1969 ”; BMNH • 1 ♂; “ONT: 5 km N.W. Almonte, 22.VII.86 G. Gibson”; CNC • 1 ♂; “ONT: 3 km N. Almonte, 17-24. VI.1986, Denis & Dumouchel, Malaise trap ”; CNC • 2 ♀♀; “PQ. Upper Rigaud, IX.1979 PT, M. Sharkey”; BMNH. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – Arizona • 1 ♀; “USA: AZ, Cochise Co., 12 km S Sierra Vista Ramsey Cyn, 1700m, 17.V.1987, B.V. Brown, MT ”; CNC. – California • 1 ♀; “ Ca: Tulare Co., Ash. Mtn. Pwr. Sta, 10-VII-1983, J.A. Halstead ”; CNC • 1 ♀; “ CA: Tulare Co., Ash. Mtn. 10.VII.83 flume, J.A. Halstead ”; BMNH • 3 ♂♂; “CAL. Riverside Co., Menifee Vly (hills on W end) 33°9′ N. 117°13′ W. 1800’ el., 17-22-X-1981, John D. Pinto ”; CNC • 1 ♀; “ Cal. San Bernardino Co., 29 Palms 8.v.84, J. Huber ”, “ Netomocera Det. Z Bouček 1991 ”; CNC • 1 ♀; “ Calif, Los Angeles Co., Frazier park near Gorman ”; “ 18-VI-1981, J.B. Wulley ”; “ Netomocera Det. Z Bouček 1991 ”; CNC. – Louisiana • 1 ♂; “LA, Iberville Parish, 4.X.1980, 8020, Masner & Bowen”; “Drying pools along Atchafalaya River ”; “ ♂ Netomocera nearctica Yosh. det. Z Bouček 1993”; CNC. – Florida • 1 ♀; “FL: Levy Co., 5 km SW Archer, 1.V-13.VIII.1987; FIT, Turkey oak shrubs, BRC Hym. team”; CNC. – Georgia • 1 ♀; “USA: GA, McIntosh Co., Sapelo Island, 18.VII-11.IX.1987, BRC Hym. team, FIT, live oak forest”; CNC • 1 ♂; “GA. Forsyth, 5.V-14.V.1971, Malaise Trap, F.T. Naumann ”; “ Lelaps det. C.M. Yoshimoto ”; “ Netomocera ”; CNC • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; “ 5-10. VI.1971 ”; “ Netomocera nearctica Yshm Det. C.M. Yoshimoto ”; CNC • 3 ♂♂; “GA: Mcintosh Co., Sapelo Island, 18.VII.1987, Live Oak Forest, BRC Hym. team”; CNC. – Mississippi • 1 ♂; “MS, Issaquena Co., 2.X.1980, 8019, Masner & Bowen”; CNC. – Missouri • 12 ♂♂; “USA: MO, Wayne Co., Williamsville, 10-26.xi.1987, J. Becker MT ”; CNC • 2 ♀♀; same data as for preceding; “ VII.1987 ”; CNC • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; “ X.1987 ”; CNC. – Nebraska • 1 ♂; “ Nebraska, Chadron, 14.VIII.80, J. Pinto ”; CNC. – Pennsylvania • 1 ♂; “Pittsburg Pa”; “ Aug. 11 1937 ”; “Carn. Mus. Acc./2032”; “Coll. [...] 34, Wallace”; “ Netomocera det. Burks ”; BMNH. – South Carolina • 2 ♂♂; “SC: Oconee Co., Clemson 250m, 20.V-5. VI.1987; FIT, Oak woodland-shore, BRC Hym. team”; CNC. – Texas • 1 ♀; “USA Texas Jeff Davis Co., Davis Mtns. St. Pk., Limpia Crk. 4800’, 18.VII.82 G.A.P. Gibson ”; CNC • 1 ♂; “TX, Big Bend N.P., 19.VII.1977, lowland desert spring, L. Masner”; “ ♂ Netomocera nearctica Yoshim. Det. Z. Bouček 1991 ”; BMNH • 1 ♂; “TEX. Brewster Co., Big Bend Natl. Pk, Cotton wood Cpga 2300’ 13-14.VIII.1982 G. Gibson ”; “ ♂ Netomocera Det. Z Bouček 1989 ”; CNC • 2 ♀♀; “USA Texas Brewster Co, Big Bend National Park, 5.3 mi. W Panther Jct., 3900’ 10-14.VII.82, G.A.P. Gibson ”; “ Netomocera sp. det. C. Desjardins ”; CNC • 1 ♂; “USA: TX: Cameron Co., Ranch Viejo (Omito), 11 mi N Brownsville, 20-28.V.1995, Denis Gumz YPT ”; “ Netomocera det. R.A. Burks 2004 ”; CNC. – Virginia • 1 ♂; “VA: Shenandoah N.P., Big Meadow 1300m, 5.V-5. VI.1987, MT, Natural meadow, BRC Hym. team”; CNC. Description Female (habitus: Figs 131, 140) COLOUR. Head (Figs 132–133) yellowish-brown to orange brown. Mandibles as head, except reddishbrown teeth. Antenna (Fig. 135) with scape and pedicel as head; flagellum as pedicel or slightly darker basally, progressively getting brown to dark brown towards clava. Mesosoma (Figs 136–138) yellowishbrown to orange brown, sutures occasionally darker, with small black spot near each fore wing base. Legs with fore and hind coxae whitish to yellowish-brown, occasionally darker basally, mid coxa as mesosoma; trochanters whitish to yellowish-brown; femora, tibiae and tarsi yellowish-brown, pretarsi dark brown. Fore wing (Figs 139, 141) with brownish spots: macropterous form with two brownish bands, one behind basal part of marginal vein and second behind stigma converging towards first, plus a somewhat paler roundish spot between second band and apical margin of wing (Fig. 141); brachypterous form with two bands broadly joined posteriorly, third spot absent when wing very short (Fig. 139); setation brown. Hind wing hyaline. Metasoma with petiole (Fig. 138) and gaster (Fig. 131) mainly yellowish-brown to orange-brown, with cercal region, tip of ovipositor sheaths and usually part of several tergites darker. Body setation whitish except large, symmetrically arranged, black setae. BODY LENGTH. 1.2–2.0 mm. HEAD. Clypeus finely coriaceous; apical margin slightly emarginate (Fig. 134). Lower face shallowly reticulate. Upper face reticulate, with reticulation becoming denser towards vertex (Fig. 133). Scrobes densely reticulate (Fig. 132). Occiput mainly finely coriaceous to alutaceous; margin blunt (Fig. 133). Toruli with lower margins below lower margins of eyes (Fig. 132). Antenna with flagellum strongly clavate; clava conspicuously asymmetric (Fig. 135). Upper face and vertex with eight large setae (Fig. 133). Head in dorsal view with width 2.0–2.1 × length and in frontal view 1.2–1.3 × height. POL 2.10–2.75 × OOL. Eye height 1.3–1.4 × length, 1.85–2.00× malar space and about equal to scape length. Head width equal to length of pedicel plus flagellum. Fu1 length 1.0–1.2× width; fu7 width 1.7–1.9 × length; clava length 1.6–1.7× width. MESOSOMA. Pronotal collar narrower than mesoscutum, with six large setae (Fig. 137). Mesonotum moderately setose (Fig. 137). Dorsal side of mesoscutum and axillae very shallowly reticulate, shiny (Fig. 137). Scutellar disc medially longitudinally striate and laterally reticulate, with elongate cells; frenal area striate (Figs 137–138). Mesepisternum coriaceous (Fig. 136). Mesepimeron transversally striate; mesepimeral sulcus virtually absent (Fig. 136). Propodeum strongly reticulate, except for almost smooth callus and small area anteriorly; nucha large, with lateral margins parallel (Fig. 138). Macropterous (Fig. 140) or brachypterous (Fig. 131). Macropterous form with fore wing extensively bare on basal half; basal cell with a few scattered setae on apical third; bare region behind marginal vein large (Fig. 141). Brachypterous form with fore and hind wings reduced and represented by stumps; fore wing with rounded or truncate apex well surpassing posterior margin of propodeum, with basal cell bare, large bare region behind marginal vein, and complete submarginal vein, reduced marginal vein and very short postmarginal and stigmal veins (Fig. 139). Mesosoma length 1.4–1.5 × width and 1.7–2.0 × height. Pronotal collar 0.25–0.30× as long as mesoscutum and 0.8–0.9× as wide as mesoscutum. Mesoscutum width 2.5–2.9 × length. Scutellum length 0.9–1.0 × width. Propodeum length about 0.6 × scutellum length. Fore wing length of macropterous form 2.9–3.0 × width; MV 4–5 × SV; PV slightly shorter than SV. Fore wing length of brachypterous form about 3.6 ×width. METASOMA. Petiole very short, transverse, with a few longitudinal costulae (Fig. 138). Gaster ovate, about 1.3–1.7 × width (Fig. 131); gt1 longest, width 1.2–1.3 × length, with hind margin produced; gt2–6 short; syntergum acutely pointed. Ovipositor sheaths slightly protruding beyond apex of gaster. Cercal setae surpassing apex of gaster. Male (habitus: Fig. 142) Differs from female mainly as follows. Body length: 1.0– 1.5 mm. Body orange brown (rarely) to blackish-brown, pronotum and propodeum usually lighter (Fig. 142). Scape and pedicel orange-brown to brown, flagellum brown to blackish, sometimes lighter ventrally (Fig. 143). Scutellum with at least a small shiny area with superficial sculpture on posterior third to half, usually including central part of frenal area, the latter at least laterally striate in large specimens. Fore wing with second infuscate band reduced to a small spot behind stigma, third spot absent (Fig. 142) and rarely all markings inconspicuous. Fu1 length 1.3–1.5 × width; length of pedicel plus flagellum 1.7–2.1 × as long as head width

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207