Bauhaus in der Provinz. Der Künstler und Gestaltungslehrer Werner Schriefers in Wuppertal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bauhaus in the “province”. The artist and design teacher Werner Schriefers in Wuppertal. Compared to the Bauhaus-City of Krefeld with its numerous Bauhaus-inspired events in 2019, the western part of Wuppertal has remained unknown as the location of a Werkkunst-schule with a Bauhaus orientation. Like Krefeld on the left of the Rhine, the former town of Wuppertal-Vohwinkel and the quarter of Döppersberg belong to the North Rhine region. Here, the free artist Werner Schriefers, a second-generation Bauhaus student, taught the elementary subject of design. Officially a student of Georg Muche, he was close to Paul Klee as an educator and as a painter, as will be shown. The comparison between the works of Schriefers and Klee means to illuminate similarities, parallels, further developments and differences. The discourse concerns the artistic work on the one hand, and the teaching of design on the other. Sometimes the artistic work already shows a didactic reference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".