MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931415231 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6147206

Arostrilepis rauschorum Makarikov, Galbreath & Hoberg, 2013, sp. n.

2013· article· en· W6931415231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityMicrotusHolotypeHost (biology)Arctic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arostrilepis rauschorum sp. n. (Figs. 6, 7) Type host: Microtus oeconomus Pallas (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Arvicolinae). Other hosts: Microtus longicaudus (Merriam), M. pennsylvanicus (Ord), M. miurus Osgood and M. xanthognathus (Leach). Type locality: Adjacent toToolik Lake, Brooks Range, Alaska, near US Department of Energy research site (ca., 68o38’N, 149o36’W). Other localities: North-central interior, Alaska, near Bonanza Creek Research Station (62o42’N, 148o16’W); Gates of Arctic National Preserve, Brooks Range, Alaska, SE side of Walker Lake (67o06’N, 154o16’W); Yukon Charley Rivers National Preserve, Alaska, across Yukon River from Glenn Creek Cabin (65o30’N, 142o03’W); Kobuk Valley National Park, Alaska, Baird Mountains, Salmon River (67o36’11”N, 159o47’20”W); and Pattee Canyon, Missoula Co., Montana (46o48’N, 113o57’W, and 46o49’N, 113o58’W). Type material: Holotype MSB Para 1208 (field number FIN 4072484) from type host and locality by H. Henttonen and G. Batzli, 24 July 1984. Paratypes MSB1360, 1362 (AF 37462 C1/ cyt- b sequence; 37462 C3) ex M. pennsylvanicus, by H. Henttonen at Bonanza Creek, 1 August 2000; MSB 1204 (FIN 2070784) from type host species and locality by H. Henttonen and G. Batzli, 7 July 1984; MSB 1211 (FIN 5220884) from type host species and locality by H. Henttonen and G. Batzli, 22 August 1984; MSB 1205, 1206 (FIN 3120884-1, 2 slides; 3120884- 2) from type host species and locality by H. Henttonen and G. Batzli, 12 August 1984; MSB 1363 (AF 42531/ cytb sequence) from type host and locality by H. Henttonen, 8 August 2000; MSB 1365 (AF 42657) ex M. oeconomus by H. Henttonen et al., near Toolik Lake, 8 August 2000; MSB 1215 (JMK 02-04) ex M. longicaudus, by J.M. Kinsella at Pattee Canyon, Montana (46o48’N, 113o57’W), 8 October 2002; MSB 1369 (AF 49499/ cyt- b sequence) ex M. longicaudus by H. Henttonen et al., from Yukon Charley, 8 August 2001; MSB 1370, 1371 (AF 59099 C3, 2 slides; 59099 C4, 2 slides) ex M. xanthognathus by A. M. Runck et al., from Gates of the Arctic National Preserve, 6 August 2002; and MSB 1216 (JMK 2009, 2 slides) ex M. pennsylvanicus, by J.M. Kinsella at Pattee Canyon, Montana (46o49’N, 113o58’W), 20 August 2009. See Appendix 1 for listing of additional identified voucher specimens. Symbiotype: Host specimen not deposited in a museum archive. Description: Based on 13 specimens. Fully developed strobila 120–185 mm long, with maximum width at pregravid or gravid proglottides, 2.4–3.8 mm. Strobila flat, consisting of 750–950 craspedote proglottides. Scolex slightly compressed dorso-ventrally, 240–300 (266, n = 7) wide, clearly wider than neck. Suckers unarmed, ovoid in surface view, relatively small, 130–190 × 120–155 (166 × 137, n = 15), with thin walls (Fig. 6 A, B). Rhynchus and rostellar apparatus absent. Neck relatively long and narrow, 125–190 (152, n = 10) wide. Two pairs of osmoregulatory canals, without transverse anastomoses. Dorsal osmoregulatory canals thin, 2–3.5 (2.6, n = 10) wide, situated predominantly in same sagittal plane as ventral canals. Ventral osmoregulatory canals 30–58 (42, n = 10) wide. Position of dorsal osmoregulatory canals not always constant; loops may be situated laterally to ventral canals. Genital pores unilateral, dextral. Genital ducts usually pass dorsally to longitudinal osmoregulatory canals, position of genital ducts between osmoregulatory canals within same strobila appears rarely (for no more than 10% proglottides) (Fig. 6 C, D). Development of proglottides gradual, protandrous. Strobilar part containing juvenile proglottides without external segmentation; proglottides become externally distinct at level of premature part of strobila. Mature proglottides 170–230 × 1330–1700 (202 × 1485, n = 16), transversely elongate, trapeziform (Fig. 6 C, D). Testes relatively large, usually three in number, almost of equal size, 130–252 × 110–194 (217 × 164, n = 35), oval or pear-shaped, commonly situated in one row; poral testis separated from two antiporal testes by female gonads. Arrangement of testes may vary (triangle or triangle with flat angle). Cirrus-sac relatively large, 210–242 × 31–42 (225 × 37, n = 23), with well-developed external muscular layers. Antiporal part of cirrus-sac commonly not reaching or rarely overlapping ventral longitudinal canal (Figs. 6 D, 7C). Genital atrium simple, cup-shaped, deep, opens laterally about middle or slightly anterior of lateral proglottis margin. Cirrus 77–92 (83, n = 18) long, conical, with relatively wide basal region, 18–23 (19, n = 18) in diameter, and narrow distal region, 12–15 (13, n = 18) in diameter; armed along entire length with relatively large (up to 3.5–4 long) rosethorn-shaped spines (Fig. 7 A). Internal seminal vesicle with circular musculature, ovoid, 87–122 × 25–38 (102 × 30, n = 23), shorter than half of cirrus-sac length (Figs. 6 D, 7C). External seminal vesicle transversely elongate, 165–270 × 55–87 (218 × 70, n = 18), clearly outlined from vas deferens, with size approximately equal to seminal receptacle. Ovary 455–585 (537, n = 25) wide, median, fan-shaped, irregularly lobed, ventral to male genital organs, occupying substantial part of median field, slightly overlapping testes (Fig. 6 D). Vitellarium 75–123 × 145–240 (96 × 193, n = 25), postovarian, median, scarcely lobed. Vagina tubular, clearly distinct from seminal receptacle; ventral to cirrus-sac. Distal part of vagina 96–120 × 8–18 (107 × 13, n = 12), thick-walled, covered externally by dense layer of intensely stained cells; poral part of vagina infundibular (Fig. 7 C). Conductive part of vagina 170–230 × 9–30 (210 × 19, n = 10), thin-walled, vastly varying in diameter depending on degree of distention with sperm. Seminal receptacle relatively small, transversely elongate, 165–280 × 50–92 (220 × 68, n = 18). Uterus appears as complex of fine-walled anastomosing tubes of varying length and diameter, positioned ventrally to other organs. With development of proglottides, tubular structures increase in width and uterus becomes labyrinthine. Testes remain in postmature and pregravid proglottides; cirrus-sac and vagina persist in gravid proglottides. Gravid proglottides transversely elongate, 300–500 × 1750–3800 (373 × 2600, n = 16). Fully developed uterus labyrinthine, occupying entire median field and extending bilaterally beyond longitudinal osmoregulatory canals (Fig. 7 D). Uterus contains numerous (up to 2100) eggs. Eggs 22–35 × 50–68, elliptical, with thin outer coat (up to 0.5); oncosphere 11–17 × 15–22 (Fig. 7 B). Embryophore fusiform, 14–20 × 38–47, with straight polar processes. Embryonic hooks small, 7.5–8.3 long. Etymology: Arostrilepis rauschorum sp. n. is named in honor of Robert L. Rausch and Virginia R. Rausch in recognition of their seminal and critical studies of parasites of arvicoline rodents, rodent systematics and biogeography at high latitudes of the Holarctic, and insights about the historical development of the Beringian fauna. Further, with the passing of Robert Rausch on 6 October 2012, this species and our recent studies across Beringia are dedicated to his memory and the legacy established by an extraordinary pioneer of parasitology and mammalogy in the north. Remarks: Arostrilepis rauschorum sp. n. is distinguished from congeners by the length and shape of the cirrus (Table 2). In A. rauschorum the cirrus is longer relative to those in A. beringiensis, A. tenuicirrosa, A. mariettavogeae, A. schilleri and A. gulyaevi, but smaller in comparison to A. macrocirrosa and A. cooki (Figs. 11, 12). The cirrus is armed with relatively large rosethorn-shaped spines and has a conical form; these features distinguish A. rauschorum from A. beringiensis, A. intermedia, A. janickii and A. schilleri (cylindrical cirrus), A. microtis and A. gulyaevi (cirrus with wide conical basal region and a cylindrical distal region) and A. tenuicirrosa (cirrus armed with relatively small needle-shaped spines and having a conical basal region and a very narrow cylindrical distal region). Arostrilepis rauschorum is characterized by a relatively wide strobila and ovary and a large seminal receptacle. The cirrus-sac is shorter than in A. horrida, but longer than in A. beringiensis, A. intermedia, A. janickii, A. mariettavogeae and A. schilleri. The egg and oncosphere are large relative to those in A. janickii, A. mariettavogeae and A. schilleri (see Table 2). The proximal end of the cirrus-sac in hermaphroditic mature proglottides commonly does not reach the ventral longitudinal canal or rarely overlaps it. Specimens of A. rauschorum are distinguished from A. horrida, A. macrocirrosa, A. tenuicirrosa, A. intermedia, A. schilleri, A. gulyaevi and A. cooki as its testes form one row; in the latter species, the testes are arranged in a triangle. Furthermore, the gravid proglottides are transversely elongate and the polar processes of the embryophore are straight in A. rauschorum. This species is a specific parasite of voles of the genus Microtus from North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207