MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931431777 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6493724

Rhombognathus Trouessart 1888

2006· article· en· W6931431777 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumClawKeelCarapaceGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Rhombognathus Trouessart, 1888 Rhombognathus scutulatus Bartsch, 1983 Rhombognathus scutulatus Bartsch, 1983: 413 –415, figs 46–57; Bartsch, 1993: 20, 21, fig. 1A–C; Bartsch, 1999: 354 –355, fig. 12F–H; Bartsch, 2000: 190; Bartsch, 2003: 273 –275, fig. 9A–D; Chatterjee, 1995: 284, figs 15–19; Chatterjee & De Troch, 2000: 187 –189, fig. 6A–F. Material examined One female, ZRC.ARA.489, 1 male, ZRC.ARA.490, Singapore, Strait of Singapore, Labrador Park (1°16’N, 103°48’E), patches of small brown and green algae from rocks, mid­tide area, 28 September 2004. Diagnosis Idiosomal length of female 360 µm, of male 322 µm. Dorsal plates foveate, fused to a single shield. Ventral plates fused. Area representing PD with single pair of setae. AE and PE generally each with one pair of adjunct setae. Female with five pairs of pgs and two pairs of sgs. Male with 19 plumose pgs, basilar setae included, the latter situated at 0.8. Male genital sclerites with two pairs of sgs. Gnathosoma 1.2 times longer than wide. Length ratio idiosoma:gnathosoma 1:0.23. Length:height ratio of telofemora 2.5–2.9. Leg chaetotaxy: leg I, 1, 2, 5–6, 5, 5, 4; leg II, 1, 2, 6, 5, 4; leg III, 1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 4; leg IV, 0, 2, 3, 3, 5, 3. Telofemora I to IV with (3–)4/(1–)2, 4/2, 3/0, 3/0 dorsal/ventral setae. None of ventral setae of genua enlarged and bipectinate. Tibiae I to IV with 2, 1, 1, 2 bipectinate setae. Paired fossary setae faintly plumose. Two basalmost setae on tarsus III adjacent. Claws rake­like with 16–19 tines Remarks Rhombognathus scutulatus is one of the most wide­spread Rhombognathus species in the Indo­West Pacific area (Bartsch, 2003: fig. 11). There seem to be differences between populations of various localities, namely in the size of the claw pectines and their number of tines and in the length of the telofemora. The largest number of tines, 24–28, was found in specimens from Rottnest Island, off Perth, Western Australia (Bartsch, 1993). Specimens from the Great Barrier Reef, tropical Queensland, had 22–24 tines (Bartsch, 2000), and those from the Dampier Archipelago, tropical Western Australia, 18–20 tines (Bartsch, 2003). In the two specimens from Singapore claws I and II had 16–17 tines, claws III and IV 17–19 tines. The type material from the Philippines had 17–19 tines. A smaller number of tines was found in two females and males from the southern coast of Sri Lanka (unpublished record, material from Ahangama, from Halimeda (Chlorophyta) on a moderately exposed fringing reef flat, 28 February 1993, coll. H.­G. Müller); claws I and II of these specimens bear 13–14 tines, claws III and IV 15 tines. Specimens from India and eastern Africa (Kenya) bear more than 17 tines (Chatterjee, 1995; Chatterjee & De Troch, 2000). An increased number of tines may be correlated with life in very agitated water. The telofemora in the specimens from Singapore, as well as in those from the Philippines, are slender, 2.5–2.9 times longer than high, whereas in specimens from western and eastern Australia (Rottnest Island, Dampier and Great Barrier Reef, respectively) the length:height ratio ranged from 2.1 to 2.5. Specimens from Sri Lanka had short telofemora, about twice as long as high. A similar wide range in the length:height ratio is else not documented in the genus Rhombognathus. Distribution and Biology Rhombognathus scutulatus is spread throughout the Indo­West Pacific area, from the Philippines in the east to Kenya in the west. The species lives in a variety of mid­tide, lowtide and shallow sublittoral habitats, on shores exposed to moderate as well as rather strong swell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207