Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyana adita (Moore, 1859) (Figs 130–132, 224, 279) Bizone Adita Moore in Horsfield & Moore, 1859, A catalogue of the lepidopterous insects in the Museum of Natural History at the East-India House 2: 306, pl. 79, fig. 11 (Type locality: “N. India ”). = Bizone bifasciata Poujade, 1886, Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France (6) 6: CXXIV [124] (Type locality: [China, Sichuan] “de Mou-Pin (Thibet)”). = Bizone walkeri Elwes, 1890, Proceedings of the general meetings for scientific business of the Zoological Society of London 1890: 393, pl. 32, fig. 7 (Type locality: “ Sikkim ”). Type material examined. Lectotype of Bizone Adita (designated herein) (Fig. 132): ♀, handwritten label “Sikhim Col. Buckley” / handwritten label “ adita type Moore” / printed label “Ind. Mus. 79.64.” / printed round label with a red circle “Type” / printed label with a unique identifier “NHMUK010597925” (Coll. NHMUK); photographs of lectotype of Bizone bifasciata (designated herein) (https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/el/item/el54 082?listIndex=1&listCount=40): ♀, “ Bizone bifasciata Pouj. Ann. Soc. Ent. 1886 Bullet. CXXIV” / “MUS.HIST. NAT. A. DAVID Moupin (Thibet) 1871” / “1523 70” / “Sampled [BOLD]: BC-MNHN0429” / round label “LEC- TOTYPE” / red label “ LECTOTYPE ” / label with a unique identifier “MNHN, Paris EL54082” (Coll. MNHN). Other material examined. HIMACHAL PRADESH: 1 ♂, N.W. Himalayas, Simla (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♀, Dalhousie (Harford) (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♂, 3 ♀, Kangra (Hocking) (Coll. NHMUK); WEST BENGAL: 5 ♂, 3 ♀, India, WB, Darjeeling, 2100m, 28.VIII–1.IX.1988, leg. W. Thomas, slides MWM 35727 (♂), MWM 35728 (♀) Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 7 ♂, India, W.B., Darjeeling, Tigerhill, 2400m, end of VI.1987, leg. Dr. W. Thomas, slide MWM 33497 (♂) Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); SIKKIM: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Sikhim (Liderdale) (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♀, Sikkim, Knyvett / Collectio H. J. Elwes, slide AV2072 ♀ Volynkin (Coll. ZFMK); 3 ♂, India, Sikkim, Dodak, 6.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 1.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 3 ♂, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 30.IX.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♂, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 1.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 25.IV.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♂, India, Sikkim, Yuksom, 2.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 3 ♂, India, Sikkim, Yuksom, 3.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♂, India, Sikkim, Phusrey Lake, 30.IV.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 4 ♂, India, Sikkim, Padamchen, 3.V.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♀, India, Sikkim, Padamchen, 3.V.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, India, Sikkim, Padamchen, 4.V.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, India, Sikkim, Dentam, 10.V.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 9 ♀, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 25.IV.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 4 ♀, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 26.IV.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 3 ♀, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 30.IX.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 3 ♀, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 1.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♀, India, Sikkim, Yuksom, 2.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 5 ♀, India, Sikkim, Yuksom, 3.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 3 ♀, India, Sikkim, Padamchen, 3.V.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 3 ♀, India, Sikkim, Phusrey lake, 30.IV.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♀, India, Okhrey, 23.IX.14, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♀, India, Okhrey, 24.IX.14, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♀, India, Dodak, 6.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♀, India, Meghalaya, Pynursla, 11.V.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♀, India Sikkim, Ravangla, 7.V.09, leg. Rahul Joshi (Coll. NZCZSI); ARUNACHAL PRADESH: 1 ♂, Arunachal Pradesh, Dirang, 1.V.13, leg. Abhinav Saxena (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, India, Arunachal Pradesh, Dirang, 2.V.13, (Coll. Abhi- nav Saxsena) (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, India, Arunachal Pradesh, Dirang, 11.V.16, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI). Remarks. 1. In the original description of Bizone Adita, Moore (1859) did not mention a number of specimens, therefore the existence of syntypes is possible. To avoid any confusion with the similar species C. signa, here we designate the female specimen deposited in NHMUK and labeled as “Type” as lectotype. 2. In the original description of Bizone bifasciata, Poujade (1886) cited three specimens of both sexes, which are syntypes. One of them (female) is labeled as lectotype (this designation is not valid as it is never published) and its photos are published in the MNHN website. In order to stabilize the nomenclature, here we designate this specimen as lectotype. 3. The type of Bizone walkeri Elwes is not found in the NHMUK collection. Here we follow Hampson (1900) and Strand (1922) and consider this taxon to be a synonym of C. adita. Diagnosis. Forewing length is 16–18 mm in males and 20–21.5 mm in females. Cyana adita is very similar to C. signa, and can be distinguished by its separated distal discal spots and slightly more curved and wavy antemedial line (that is oblique and almost straight in C. signa). The male genitalia of C. adita differ from those of C. signa by their slightly narrower uncus, larger lateral lobes of vinculum, slightly longer ampulla, longer distal lobe of subbasal diverticulum, shorter ventral lobe of subbasal diverticulum, and more robust spinules of the distal cluster. The female genitalia of C. adita differ from those of C. signa by the narrower ostium bursae, the shorter sclerotized area in the posterior section of corpus bursae, and the narrower appendix bursae. Distribution. Pakistan (Azad Jammu & Kashmir) (present study), North and North East India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, north of West Bengal, Sikkim, Assam, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh) (Hampson 1900; Strand 1922; Smetacek 2008; Singh et al. 2014), Nepal (Kishida 1993; 1994), China (Shaanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Guangdong, Hubei, Fujian) (Poujade 1886; Fang 2000; Dubatolov et al. 2012), North Thailand (Chiang Mai Prov.) and North Vietnam (Fan-si-pan Mts) (Černý & Pinratana 2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".