MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931449466 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5971628

Phthiraptera Haeckel 1896

2018· article· en· W6931449466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllotypeHolotypeParatypeTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phthiraptera euarctidos Hopkins, 1954, Trichodectes pinguis Valid Name: Trichodectes euarctidos Hopkins, 1954 holotype + allotype (2 male /female, slide) Verbatim: Dom. Entom. Lab. Kamloops, B.C. No 1193 Loc Gray Crk B.C. 3 June 1936 Host Euarctos americanus Coll T.K. Molliet / CNC 165268. Interpretive data: CANADA. British Columbia: Kamloops, Gray Creek, 49°37′48.69″N 116°47′3.33″W, 3.vi.1936, ex Ursus americanus Pallas, T.K. Molliet, CNC Type No. 21208, CNC165268. Determination: Trichodectes pinguis euarctidos Hopkins ♂ Holotype + ♀ allotype / HOLOTYPE Trichodectes pinguis euarctidos H CNC No. 21208 / ALLOTYPE Trichodectes pinguis euarctidos H. CNC No. 21208. gibsoni Hopkins, 1947, Lagopoecus holotype + allotype (2 male /female, slide) Verbatim: Canadian National Collection C.R.T. Loc.: Dollard, SASK. Host: Centrocercus urophasianus Date: 10.VII.1935 Coll.: C.F. Holmes / CNC 165223. Interpretive data: CANADA. Saskatchewan: Dollard, 49°36′51.27″N 108°35′1.23″W, 10.vii.1935, ex Centrocercus urophasianus (Bonaparte), C.F. Holmes, CNC Type No. 5693, CNC165223. Determination: Can. Nat. Coll. Type no. 5693 Lagopoecus gibsoni Hopkins HOLOTYPE ALLOTYPE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207