Archiinocellia oligoneura Handlirsch 1910
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archiinocellia oligoneura Handlirsch, 1910 Fig. 11 Type material. Holotype GSC 7250, collected by L[awrence]. M. L[ambe], 21.vii.1906, deposited in the collections of the GSC, Ottawa. Portions of overlapped fore- and hind wings covered with Canada balsam. Type locality and horizon. “Opposite Horsefly mine”, Horsefly, British Columbia, Canada; early Eocene (Ypresian). Diagnosis. May be distinguished from A. protomaculata by clearly wider wings (forewing length/width 2.69– 3.08 in A. oligoneura; 3.63–4.15 in A. protomaculata). Redescription. Forewing 7–8 mm long (estimated), 2.6 mm wide. Costal space not preserved. ScP very short, terminating on costal margin strongly distad crossvein 2ra-rp; length from termination of ScP to pterostigma slightly greater than length of pterostigma. Distal part of subcostal space broad, with distal crossvein 2scp-r nearly straight. Pterostigma elongate (4.6 times longer than width measured along to costal margin), lightly pigmented. At least two branches of RA: one within pterostigma, strongly inclined, in middle of pterostigma; other forming distal margin of pterostigma; no branch distad pterostigma discernible. RA space with two crossveins forming two radial cells nearly equal in length: 2ra-rp located about mid-way between pterostigma, termination of ScP; 3ra-rp located in distal part of pterostigma along RA. RP originating at obtuse angle, with three pectinate branches: RP1 deeply forked, with anterior branch simple, posterior forked; other branches (RP2, RP3) simple. One long intraradial crossvein rp1-rp2 between stems of RP, RP1. Two preserved between RP, MA (1r-m, 2r-m) connecting stem of RP, MA. M forked well proximad origin of RP, probably fused with CuA for short distance. MA deeply, dichotomously forked twice. MP strongly zigzagged, anterior trace with two simple branches. Two intramedian crossveins form two doi (distal doi markedly longer): 2im very long, joins posterior branch of MA. Anterior trace CuA strongly zigzagged, fused with MP for long distance to form part of posterior margin of basal doi. Crossvein icu between CuA, CuP long. Basal portion, CuP, anal veins not preserved or not clearly understandable. Hind wing about 6.5–7 mm long (estimated), 2.25 mm wide. Costal space and ScP not preserved. One crossvein detected in subcostal space, 2scp-r, forming basal margin of pterostigma. Distal part of subcostal space broad, with distal crossvein 2scp-r nearly straight. Pterostigma elongate (4.7 times longer than width measured along to costal margin), lightly pigmented. At least two branches of RA: one within pterostigma, strongly inclined, in middle of pterostigma; other forming distal margin of pterostigma; no branches distad pterostigma discernible. RA space with two preserved crossveins: 2ra-rp distad termination of ScP; 3ra-rp located in distal part of pterostigma along RA. RP with three pectinate branches: RP1 deeply forked, with anterior branch simple, posterior forked; other branches (RP2, RP3) simple. One long intraradial crossvein rp1-rp2 between stems of RP, RP1. Two preserved between RP, MA: 2r-m connects stem of RP, MA; 3r-m connects stem of RP1, MA. M probably forked proximad origin of RP. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice. MP: anterior trace zigzagged, simple, with three simple, pectinate branches (alternatively: anterior trace forked, with two simple, pectinate branches). Two intramedian crossveins form two doi, proximal much shorter than distal. One preserved crossvein between M, Cu (2m-cu) connecting MP, CuA. Anterior trace of CuA simple distally, with one preserved simple branch. Basal portion, CuP, anal veins not preserved or not clearly understandable. Remarks. Handlirsch (1910) incorrectly believed that his Fig. 4 depicted the forewing and his Fig. 5 the hind wing, however, the opposite is true.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".