MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931461247 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5312049

Lispe Latreille 1797

2010· article· en· W6931461247 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeNearctic ecozoneGenusFar EastEast Asia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Lispe Latreille, 1797 Lispe Latreille, 1797: 169. (Without included species.) Type-species: Musca tentaculata De Geer, 1776, by subsequent monotypy (Latreille, 1802: 462). Lispe apicalis Mik, 1869 Lispe apicalis Mik, 1869: 33. Type-locality: Austria, Vienna, Brigittenau. Syntypes 2♂, NMW. Siberian records: Novosibirskaya Oblast’ (Sorokina, 2006a: 229). General distribution: Palaearctic Region, from Europe east to north-west China. Note: Re-examination of the material upon which the record from the Novosibirskaya Oblast’ was based shows that it was probably misidentified, but work to establish its identity is ongoing. Lispe canadensis Snyder, 1954 Lispe canadensis Snyder, 1954: 29. Type-locality: Canada, Northwest Territories, Chesterfield. Holotype ♂, CNC (Cooper & Cumming, 2000: 80). Siberian records: North Respublika Sakha [Yakutiya]: Verchoyansk, Bagatay (Sychevskaya, 1972: 145, 148, identification queried); East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 185). General distribution: East Siberia and Nearctic Region (Northwest Territories, Manitoba, Labrador). Lispe consanguinea Loew, 1858 Lispe consanguinea Loew, 1858: 8. Type-localities: Germany and Sweden. Syntypes 7♂ 3♀, ZMHU (Pont & Werner, 2006: 36). Siberian records: River Nizhnyaya Tunguska, Mt. Lavrushi, Respublika Sakha: probably Yakutsk [as “Jakut.” in German] (Hennig, 1960a: 429); East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 186). General distribution: Palaearctic Region, from Europe east to Japan, and also Pakistan. Lispe cotidiana Snyder, 1954 Lispe cotidiana Snyder, 1954: 22. Type-locality: Canada, Alberta, Suffield. Holotype ♂, AMNH (Huckett, 1975: 34). Siberian records: Respublika Buryatiya, Zabaykal’e [Transbaikalia], Kyakhta [as “Troitzkosawsk” in German] and Nerchinsk (Hennig, 1960a: 430); East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 186). General distribution: East Palaearctic Region: Russia (East Siberia and Far East), Mongolia, China (Qinghai), and Nearctic Region. Lispe flavinervis Becker, 1904 Lispe flavinervis Becker, 1904: 20. Type-locality: China, Qinghai, Baingol, River Kurlyk. Lectotype ♀, ZIN (designated by Pont, 2004: 75). Siberian records: Sverdlovskaya Oblast’, Nevyansk (Becker, 1913: 125); Urals (Hennig, 1960b: 434; Zimin & El’berg, 1970: 555); West Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 186). General distribution: Russia (South-east European Territory, West Siberia), Mongolia, China (Qinghai). Lispe frigida Erichson, 1851 Lispe frigida Erichson in Middendorf, 1851: 67. Type-locality: Russia, East Siberia, south of Taymyr Peninsula, River Boganida. Holotype ♀, ZIN (Pont, 2004: 75). Lispe parcespinosa Becker, 1900: 47. Type-locality: Russia, West Siberia, Yenisey estuary, Nikandrik Island. Syntypes 1♀, ZMH, and 1♂, ZMHU (Pont & Werner, 2006: 800). Siberian records: Taymyr Peninsula, River Boganida (Erichson in Middendorff, 1851: 67, type-locality of frigida); Nikandrik Island, Yenisey estuary (Becker, 1900: 47, type-locality of parcespinosa; Becker, 1904: 52); Siberia (Becker, 1904: 55); north-west Siberia (Zimin & El’berg, 1970: 554); West and East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 186). General distribution: Holarctic Region; rare in Europe, Russia (Siberia) and North China. Lispe melaleuca Loew, 1847 Lispe melaleuca Loew, 1847: 28. Type-locality: Italy, Sicily. Syntypes 4♂ 2♀, ZMHU, 1♂ 1♀, ZIN, and 1♂, OUMNH (all seen by Pont, 2004: 77; Pont & Werner, 2006: 67). The record given by Hennig (1960b: 446) from south of Lake Baykal (Priyutsk Kol. west of Almatinka Semir), upon which subsequent records from East Siberia are based (Zimin & El’berg, 1970: 554; Pont, 1986a: 188), should be deleted from the Siberian list as this locality is actually in Kazakhstan. General distribution: Palaearctic Region, from Europe east to China, and also the north-west of the Oriental Region (Kashmir). Lispe sp. of palposa (Walker, 1849) group Central Respublika Sakha [Yakutiya]: Yakutsk, Khomustakh nasleg (Sychevskaya, 1972: 148). Lispe pygmaea Fallén, 1825 Lispe pygmaea Fallén, 1825b: 94. Type-locality: Sweden, Skåne, Äsperöd. Lectotype ♂, NHRS (designated by Pont, 1984b: 292). Siberian records: Kurganskaya Oblast’ (Sorokina, 2006a: 230); Irkutskaya Oblast’, Slyudyanskiy Rayon, Lake Baykal, Kultuk and Respublika Buryatiya, Ust Kiran (as “ Insel des Tschikoi-Flusses” in German) (Hennig, 1960b: 452–453); Pribaykal’e (Zimin & El’berg, 1970: 556); West and East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 189). General distribution: Palaearctic Region, from Europe east to the Russian Far East; also Oriental and Afrotropical (Sudan, Cape Verde Is) Regions. Lispe superciliosa Loew, 1861 Lispe superciliosa Loew, 1861: 351. Type-localities: Poland, Silesia, and Austria, Carinthian Alps. Syntype 1♂, ZMHU (Pont & Werner, 2006: 102). Siberian records: Sverdlovskaya Oblast’, Nevyansk (Hennig, 1960b: 456); Urals (Canzoneri & Meneghini, 1966: 127; Zimin & El’berg, 1970: 554); Novosibirskaya Oblast’ (Sorokina, 2006a: 230); Irkutskaya Oblast’, Slyudyanskiy Rayon, Lake Baykal, Kultuk and Yakutsk (Hennig, 1960b: 456); Central Respublika Sakha [Yakutiya]: Yakutsk, Khomustakh nasleg (Sychevskaya, 1972: 148); West and East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 190). General distribution: Palaearctic Region, from Europe east to Russia (East Siberia) and north-west China. Lispe tentaculata (De Geer, 1776) Musca tentaculata De Geer, 1776: 86. Type-locality: Sweden, Uppland, Lövsta district. Syntypes,?sex, not in NHRS, presumed destroyed (Persson, Pont & Michelsen, 1984: 93). Siberian records: Novosibirskaya Oblast’ (Sorokina, 2006a: 230); Yamalo-Nenetskiy AO: Salekhard [as “Obdorsk”], Respublika Sakha [Yakutiya]: Yakutsk, Olenek village, Darbinskaya on east bank of River Lena and River Lena at 66 o 26'N (Hennig, 1960b: 458); valley of River Yenisey, forest steppe: Krasnoyarskiy Kray (Minusinsk, Shushenskoe), Respublika Tyva (Kyzyl, Cherbi) (Sychevskaya, 1974: 129); West and East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 190). General distribution: Holarctic, Neotropical (Guadeloupe I., Guatemala, Peru) and Oriental (India (Kashmir) and Pakistan) Regions; in the Palaearctic Region, from Europe east to Japan. Lispe uliginosa Fallén, 1825 Lispa uliginosa Fallén, 1825b: 93. Type-locality: Sweden, Västergötland. Lectotype ♂, NHRS (designated by Pont, 1984b: 294). Siberian records: Urals, Yamalo-Nenetskiy AO: Salekhard [as “Obdorsk”], Respublika Sakha [Yakutiya] (Hennig, 1960b: 460); Kurganskaya Oblast’ (Sorokina, 2006a: 230); Central Respublika Sakha [Yakutiya]: Yakutsk, Khomustakh nasleg (Sychevskaya, 1972: 148); Siberia (Zimin & El’berg, 1970: 554); West and East Siberia (Pont, 1986a: 191). General distribution: Holarctic Region; in the Palaearctic, from Europe east to the Russian Far East.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207